[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Rock and a hard place



Kell:
Boulder County does not have an optical scan system.  The punch card system used card readers to tally votes.  

  -----Original Message-----
From: kellen carey [mailto:kcarey636@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 11:42 AM
To: Alan; Boulder Computer Voting
Subject: Re: Rock and a hard place

Alan,
 
This is a complicated subject.  Few people are informed well enough to make a decision.  There are a whole range of intertwined electoral and technical issues, and the more a I read/learn, the more layers of complexity I see.
 
I suggest we be cautious.
 
Therefore, I suggest for Boulder County what Al Kolwicz of CAMBER is suggesting:
 
1. In the short term (i.e. 2004, possibly 2005), we should opt for hand-marked paper ballots, preferably identical to the absentee mailed ballots, all read by the same optical scanning devices Boulder County already owns and has been using for years.
 
2. That buys some time to acquire in the future computer/voter interface machines (whether touchscreen or other) capable of multiple ballots, multiple languages, second chance voting, a voter verifiable paper ballot, and audio capability for the one ADA-compliant machine mandated per precinct by HAVA.
 
3. There should be NO digital balloting at all unlessl all technical security and privacy issues have been thoroughly hashed out to the satisfaction of a whole range of independent testers and experts.  Establishing the specifications, testing, reviews, etc., will almost certainly take several years.
 
kell 

Alan <Alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok, for everyone that attended the meetings in Boulder regarding the
Electronic Voting machines currently being considered for Boulder county
(and for others that are generally informed on the subject), what is your
favorite system?

I personally feel that some of the sales people were bold face lying in
their presentations and some were deliberately misleading in their answers
to certain questions. There are to many security concerns and proprietary
software issues with any of the systems. This decision is like which flavor
of mud do you like best. If I were to choose today I believe I would still
go with Advante due to their embracing the voter verifiable paper ballot.

In many ways I am suspicious of the whole effort to use DRE's in the voting
process. I personally feel that we should mark a paper ballot and then
place it in the "v! ote reader" scanner. When the display verifies that the
ballot scan reflects the voters intentions then the ballot is transfer to
the ballot box. That way we have a check and balances system and paper
ballots for a recount.

What are your thoughts.

Alan


Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search