Alan,
   
  This is a complicated subject.  Few people are informed well enough 
  to make a decision.  There are a whole range of intertwined electoral and 
  technical issues, and the more a I read/learn, the more layers of 
  complexity I see.
   
  I suggest we be cautious.
   
  Therefore, I suggest for Boulder County what Al Kolwicz of 
  CAMBER is suggesting:
   
  1. In the short term (i.e. 2004, possibly 2005), we should opt 
  for hand-marked paper ballots, preferably identical to the absentee 
  mailed ballots, all read by the same optical scanning devices Boulder County 
  already owns and has been using for years.
   
  2. That buys some time to acquire in the future computer/voter 
  interface machines (whether touchscreen or other) capable of multiple 
  ballots, multiple languages, second chance voting, a voter verifiable paper 
  ballot, and audio capability for the one ADA-compliant machine mandated 
  per precinct by HAVA.
   
  3. There should be NO digital balloting at all unlessl all 
  technical security and privacy issues have been thoroughly hashed 
  out to the satisfaction of a whole range of independent testers and 
  experts.  Establishing the specifications, testing, reviews, etc., will 
  almost certainly take several years.
   
  kell 
Alan <Alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  wrote:
  Ok, 
    for everyone that attended the meetings in Boulder regarding 
    the
Electronic Voting machines currently being considered for Boulder 
    county
(and for others that are generally informed on the subject), what 
    is your
favorite system?
I personally feel that some of the sales 
    people were bold face lying in
their presentations and some were 
    deliberately misleading in their answers
to certain questions. There are 
    to many security concerns and proprietary
software issues with any of the 
    systems. This decision is like which flavor
of mud do you like best. If I 
    were to choose today I believe I would still
go with Advante due to their 
    embracing the voter verifiable paper ballot.
In many ways I am 
    suspicious of the whole effort to use DRE's in the voting
process. I 
    personally feel that we should mark a paper ballot and then
place it in 
    the "v! ote reader" scanner. When the display verifies that the
ballot 
    scan reflects the voters intentions then the ballot is transfer to
the 
    ballot box. That way we have a check and balances system and 
    paper
ballots for a recount.
What are your 
    thoughts.
Alan
  
  
  Do you Yahoo!?
The 
  New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product 
search