[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: County RFP excerpts
- To: 'Neal McBurnett' <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bcv@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: County RFP excerpts
- From: "Mcgrath, Bob___PI_Mkt" <bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:53:34 -0700
- Delivered-to: mailing list bcv@booyaka.com
- Delivered-to: moderator for bcv@booyaka.com
- Mailing-list: contact bcv-help@booyaka.com; run by ezmlm
Also helpful to know is that the Secretary of State has assembled committees
to deal with implementation of HAVA, and that includes the certification of
approved technologies and vendors for meeting the requirements of moving to
electronic voting. Interestingly, in addition to various county election
officials, I believe there are voting machine vendor reps sitting on these
committees. See: (go to HAVA section, then sub-committee list).
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/main.htm
Interestingly, they have replaced the original document that was there with
new documents that do not list the company affiliations, but I still have a
copy of the original and among the companies listed are:
Hart Intercivic (manufacturer of voting machines); Visual Information; SKLD
Information Services; Fidlar Software; Computer Information Concepts; Wyant
Data Systems; GoForms; Kuvera Enterprise Solutions; ACS; and Moye, Giles,
O'Keefe, Vermiere & Gorrell Law Firm. These company reps, along with 2
county clerks and a couple of title companies sit on the Technology
Standards Committee. I'm not aware if any of these folks are involved in
voting machines other than Hart.
-----Original Message-----
From: Neal McBurnett [mailto:neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 11:10 PM
To: bcv@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: County RFP excerpts
The county RFP is very informative (as was being a pollwatcher at the
election the other night!)
The full RFP (74 pages) is at
http://bcv.booyaka.com/rfp.pdf
Here are some useful excerpts:
The projected schedule for this project is as follows:
5/9/03 RFP Issued
5/22/03 Pre-proposal conference and site visit
5/26/03 Questions due (by 3:00 p.m.)
5/29/03 County issues answers to vendor's questions
6/9/03 Proposals due
6/10/03-6/23/03 Elections Review Committee evaluates RFP's
7/7/03-8/8/03 Demonstrations/Oral Presentation Citizens Review Committee
8/8/03-8/9/03 Demonstration/Presentation - Voting Fair
09/30/03 Citizens Review Committee Comment Review
10/31/03 Citizens Review Committee (CRC) findings submitted to Elections
Review Committee (ERC)
11/30/03 Contract Negotiations
12/15/03 Award Contract
II. PURPOSE Through this solicitation, Boulder County is seeking to
procure a fully integrated voting system to replace the current
Datavote punch card system that will include: " A Direct Record
Electronic (DRE) component (both hardware and software) that can be
used 1) at polling places and 2) during the early voting period. It
shall be easy to use by all voters and accessible to those with
visual impairments and those with other specific needs. " An Optical
scan capability for absentee/vote by mail/provision voting component
(both hardware and software) that will accommodate the County's
current needs and will be capable of handling substantial growth in
absentee voting in the near future. The integrated system will be
used by the voters of Boulder County for Federal, State and local
elections conducted within the term of the contract that results from
this Request for Proposal
III. BACKGROUND 1. Reason Boulder County is moving to a New Voting
System Boulder County uses the Datavote punch card voting system. The
use of punch card systems has been banned by the Federal Courts and
the Colorado Secretary of State.
On March 6, 2003, the Boulder County Commissioners directed the
Boulder County Clerk & Recorders office to issue a Request for
Proposal to acquire a voting system with a Direct Record Electronic
(DRE) component that is integrated with an optical scan
absentee/mail/provisional ballot component. The County must move to
the new system by the August 2004 Colorado Primary Election.
The DRE system component shall, at a minimum, be easy for the voter
to use; the voting booth and voting device shall be easy to transport
and easy for the poll workers to assemble and disassemble; this
system component shall operate independently and not be tied to a
larger network, like the internet or the County's network; it must
receive both national and state certification prior to award of a
contract and be secure and tamperproof; the system shall provide the
ballot in multiple languages and have audio/voice capabilities to
serve those voters who are visually impaired.
The optical scan system component that will be used for absentee
balloting shall be fully integrated (i.e., ballot layout, ballot
generation, ballot tabulation and reporting) with the DRE system
component. The ballots shall be easy for the voters to use, it shall
be secure and tamperproof, and it shall provide the ballot in
multiple languages.
2. Constraints The County's final decision to acquire a new voting
system will be contingent on finding a system that is manageable and
capable of accommodating the needs of a large county in access of
200,000 registered voters. It is also contingent on the County's
receipt of HAVA funding and/or Federal funding to assist in the
purchase of the system
...Boulder County uses the "Integrity" election management system and
'Teamwork Ballot Tabulation", both developed by Sequoia Voting
Systems.
7.1 The vendor shall be prepared to support an optical scan type ballot,
should the need arise.
17.1 d. The proposed system shall produce, at the time the voter
votes his OR her ballot OR at the time the polls are closed, a paper
version or representation of the voted ballot OR of all the ballots
cast on a unit of the voting system. The paper version shall not be
provided to the voter but shall be Retained by the Boulder County
Clerk & Recorder for use during any recount OR contest, as required
by Colorado Revised Statutes.
21.1 c. The proposed system shall move and store data from the DREs
and absentee/mail/provisional ballot system, interfacing with Windows
NT operating system software. Data being moved between components
will be protected using industry standard encryption.
21.1 d. All software used to move results shall generate logs reporting
all unexpected error conditions, movement of vote totals, log data
and operator activity occurring during any time votes are accumulated
at the central count point.
30.1 Requirement The proposed system shall have the ability to cast
ballots using all special options prescribed by the Colorado
Elections Code, including methods of selecting more than one
candidate by casting a single vote (e.g., President and Vice
President); other methods for handling cross-voting between parties
in open, blanket or unitary primary elections; the "modified" closed
primary; and any other pattern of voting authorized by the Elections
Code.
31.... The media also asks for key (targeted) precinct results to be
printed once the precinct has been counted. Up to 20 precincts are
identified as key precincts in a countywide election. The key
precinct reports are automatically sent to a pre-determined printer.
32.1 The software shall generate a statement of vote Report that complies
with section 15501 of the Colorado Election Code.
37.2 (3) What are the warehouse power requirements for 1,250 (1,000
for polling places + 250 for line abatement and backup devices)? How
many backup batteries can be charged simultaneously on a single
20-amp circuit?
53.1 b. The remainder of the system components shall be delivered
beginning no later May 1, 2004 and ending no later than June 15,
2004. d. Acceptance testing shall be completed after installation of
the system, no later than June 15,2004.