[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FW: C.V.V. Statement



 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Tiger [mailto:tigerp@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:07 AM
To: BCV
Subject: RE: C.V.V. Statement
Importance: High

 

To the list – so I can stop repeating myself …

 

BC has card DataVote system that will be outlawed on January 1st of 2004. This must be replaced before the August primary.

 

THERE HAS BEEN NO EXTENSION OF ANYTHING. All the stories that I have seen written on CVV; said to me on the phone; supposedly repeated by town clerks; people who used to work there; etc, ad nauseam are wrong.

 

Brian Mooty of the elections division of the secretary of state’s office has just confirmed this with me by phone. My reading of the HAVA statutes are (and have been) correct.

 

Boulder’s equipment will be illegal and unusable as if January 1st. By August, there must be one DRE in every precinct in Boulder (272).

 

January 1st, 2006 is the outside deadline date for full compliance. Boulder will be in full compliance by August of 2004, because we have no other choice.

 

If you call the state and speak to someone other than Brian or Drew, you are talking to people that don’t know and are not responsible for this information. I very much doubt that anyone else would give out HAVA information. I’ve been told by two people that Rose Sanchez has been giving out information about HAVA deadlines, this is not her purview and should not be speaking about it.

Rose in informational for Mail Ballot Plans, Voting Systems Certification, Initiative Petition Verification.

Even if you spoke with Billy Compton, Director of Elections, he would send you to Drew or Brian

Everyone at the state does not know everyone else’s business. If you get wrong information you can’t be mad later because you forced your source to tell you what you wanted to hear.

 

BOULDER COUNTY MUST MAKE PURCHASING DECISIONS SOON. This equipment must be in place by August of 2004. People have to be trained on it beforehand. The commissioner plan to make those decisions in less than a month.

 

We might be able to delay the decision by a short period of time, but hardly until after we need it.

 

Personally, I would opt for optoscannable ballots filled out at the polls until we can come up with a better DRE, but that would BREAK THE LAW.

 

Paul Tiger

303-774-6383 voice and messages

720-323-0570 cell

 

When you earnestly believe that you can compensate for a lack of skill, there is no end to what you can't do.

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: kellen carey [mailto:kcarey636@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:54 PM
To: Al Kolwicz; Neal Mc Burnett; Paul Walmsley; joe pezzillo; Laura Price
Subject: C.V.V. Statement

 

All,

 

(Someone please be kind enough to forward to Ralph Schnelvar and Paul Tiger, as I have not saved their e-mail addresses.) 

 

Below is a suggested plan for distributing at tomorrow's function.  I borrowed both ideas and words rather heavily and unashamedly from Al.  It basically states our position, contains most of what we want the four parties and other orgs to sign, and provides context for people lacking that.

 

But then again, maybe I am wrong.  It's in progress.

 

Please let me know what you have slight reservations about and what you have strong reservations about.

 

Please note: the deadline for ADA compliant is Jan. 1, 2006.  CO HAVA is clear about that.  If that is in fact the case, then I see no reason at all for BC to commit to any equipment now.  Am I wrong? 

 

If so, please explain "Section 301 Voting Systems Standards Deadline for compliance 01/01/06...The State of Colorado will ensure that there is at least one DRE in every polling place by the required deadline." 

 

Love and Kisses,

 

kell


Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard