RE: recounts in Colorado (under present law) -- The definition of insanity

["Paul Tiger" <tigerp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a nice idea. So I went to run the sample ballot and the submit is
trying to send the perl to my machine. Nice when the demo bombs.

Paul Tiger

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Crandall [mailto:ipix@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 7:23 PM
To: cmalley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Boulder Computer Voting
Subject: RE: recounts in Colorado (under present law) -- The definition of
insanity

Chris,

Here is one link that Bob provided in an earlier email.

 http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/

They will not be in play for the next national election but they may be
moving in the right direction.

Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: cmalley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cmalley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 5:34 PM
To: bcv@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: recounts in Colorado (under present law) -- The definition
of insanity


Lou Puls wrote:
>
> There is an open source project in the works (unfortunately not soon
> available) that potentially will provide secure, private, verifiable,

> and recountable voting that cannot reasonably be subject to fraud.  To

> me that would indeed be superior to not only secret software, but also

> hand-counting, which can and always has been susceptible to fraud.


Where can one find details on this open source project?

-Chris