Caltech/MIT study shows hand-counting, scanning most accurate

[Evan Daniel Ravitz <evan@xxxxxxxx>]

Folks,

I just rejoined the list. Mainly to note that the Caltech/MIT voting
study which is at: http://www.vote.caltech.edu/ and listed in our
site's "Other Resources" under Security Analyses clearly says that
hand-counting and paper ballot scanning have the
least problems. The shorter fact sheet at

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/voting2facts.html

mentions this under "equipment"

By the way, Victoria Collier, who's dad and uncle wrote Votescam in
the '80s, is starting a nationwide email list/website soon called
SaveDemocracy. I'll let you know when it's up. For now, you can read
part of the book at www.Votescam.com

Evan

----------------------------------------------
Evan Ravitz     303 440 6838     evan@xxxxxxxx
Ratify the National Initiative!   www.Vote.org
Photo Adventures:          www.Vote.org/photos
Bush vs the Pope!            www.Vote.org/Bush
Sins of the father Bush   www.Vote.org/silence

Kucinich: the ONLY candidate to vote against the
"Patriot" Act and the Iraq war:  www.kucinich.us
-------------------------------------------------