[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
URGENT: SoS Rejects Citizen's Sample Count / Halicki Claims Hart NOT Paper Ballot System
- To: cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "CVV Steering Committee" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: URGENT: SoS Rejects Citizen's Sample Count / Halicki Claims Hart NOT Paper Ballot System
- From: "Joe Pezzillo" <jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 11:01:46 -0600
- Cc: "Evan Daniel Ravitz" <evan@xxxxxxxx>, toso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Clay Evans" <evansc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, michael@xxxxxxxx, "Barry Satlow" <bsat@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert Mcgrath" <mcgrath_mcnally@xxxxxxx>, valenty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "HIllary Hall" <chair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, joel@xxxxxxxx, commissioners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, romanoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Sam Fuqua" <sam@xxxxxxxx>, "Alice Madden" <repmaddenhd10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, llacy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Judd Golden" <juddgolden@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jason Salzman" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, crystal_boulder@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net
- List-help: <mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net>
- List-post: <mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net>
- Mailing-list: contact cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net; run by ezmlm
Boulder County CVV Members and Other Concerned Citizens:
Unfortunately, again we have some pressing issues to deal with in
Boulder County relating to our new voting system:
1) The SoS by way of Drew Durham has rejected the proposal by Boulder
County citizens to perform a statistically significant hand count of
ballots to verify our voting system. The hand count has been considered
a crucial component to verify the trustworthiness of any mechanical
tally system. Without it, we have no way to verify the system is
accurate (despite any vendor's false claims about their systems being
perfect or elections officials claims that they know better than the
citizens they supposedly represent). Therefore, unless it is
definitively established as part of the procedure, I will suggest that
we re-mobilize ASAP to vigorously oppose any unverifiable system being
purchased by or used in Boulder County. Perhaps Evan Ravitz would like
to detail his complete hand count procedure and now might be the time
for us to consider such alternative approaches since we clearly cannot
rely on State or Local elections officials (or the Vendors they appear
to be working for) to provide trustworthy elections as we've patiently
requested.
2) In learning about this, Tom Halicki, Boulder County Elections
Manager, has said that the Hart system they propose to purchase IS NOT
BASED ON PAPER BALLOTS, instead the paper ballots are simply a way to
create electronic ballots via scanning, and these electronic ballots
will be the official record of the vote. If this is the case, I will
URGE that we re-mobilize to oppose any such system being purchased with
our taxpayer's money. We have been 100% forthcoming in our demand for
paper ballots, I invite the Boulder County Clerk's office to be 100%
forthcoming with their plans, including use of any non-paper ballot
systems in Boulder County in opposition to the Citizen's Requirements
for Trustworthy Elections.
As Tom is a subscriber to the CVV Discussion mailing list, I invite him
to clarify both issues ASAP.
Please Note that Colorado House Bill 1227 which will be voted on by the
appropriations committee tomorrow will make it much harder for We the
People to challenge not only such closed-door activities and behaviors
by the Secretary of State and county officials, it will also make it
virtually impossible for us to verify our elections systems.
We need to have a full group meeting as soon as possible to discuss
these developments and determine the depth and breadth of our response,
ranging from citizen actions to possible legal and electoral
challenges.
If you care about Trustworthy Elections in Boulder County and beyond,
your immediate action is needed.
Joe