|
This is pathetic, Al. I would hope that the AG's office would want to
discuss this concern with you directly and right away to ascertain
whether there is an impropriety on the SoS' office or not. The e-mail
thread comes across as a blatant disregard for a citizen's concern. Monty alkolwicz wrote: You all might want to read this sequence -- bottom up. Al -----Original Message----- From: alkolwicz [mailto:alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 7:19 AM To: 'Office of the Attorney General' Subject: RE: Public interest protection Too bad. Again, thank you very much for your prompt advice. Al -----Original Message----- From: Office of the Attorney General [mailto:attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 7:16 AM To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Public interest protection No"alkolwicz" <alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx> 4/29/2004 7:58:21 AM >>>I have done so, and will continue to do so. Is there no way to require the SOS office to cease and desist? Al -----Original Message----- From: Office of the Attorney General [mailto:attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 6:55 AM To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Public interest protection Again, if you believe the Secretary of State is providing erroneous information to legislators, then it is your right to contact legislators to rebut the information."alkolwicz" <alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx> 4/29/2004 7:51:21 AM >>>Thank you for your prompt consideration. As you see, the conflict is with the Secretary of State, and I have met with the Secretary of State and they refuse to correct this false information using arguments that are outlandish. There must be a way to get third party help in a situation like this. We've got the accused serving as judge. Al -----Original Message----- From: Office of the Attorney General [mailto:attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 6:39 AM To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Public interest protection If you believe there has been an error, we suggest you contact the Secretary of State's office with your information. Otherwise, you have the right to contact legislators to correct what you believe to be erroneous information."alkolwicz" <alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx> 4/28/2004 6:48:41 PM >>>Attorney General Salazar, The Secretary of State's office has provided what we believe to be inaccurate testimony to the Colorado legislature on a bill that was created by the SOS's office - HB04-1227. At least one Senator, on 3/4 vote said, before voting, that he voted against a strengthening amendment because of the SOS testimony. We believe that the SOS should have known the accurate facts or at least explained that there were differences of opinion. Is there any provision in the law to protect the public from public officials' providing legislators with inaccurate data when lobbying for their own bill? The bill is due for 3rd hearing in the Senate. Thank you for your prompt consideration. Al Kolwicz Executive Director CAMBER Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results 2867 Tincup Circle Boulder, CO 80305 303-494-1540 AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz http://coloradovoter.blogspot.com |