[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 46 DAYS TILL ELECTION DAY! - CAN WE PROTECT THE VOTE?
- To: <AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx>, <pklammer@xxxxxxx>, "'Robert Mcgrath'" <mcgrath_mcnally@xxxxxxx>, <cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx>, <cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mlambie@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <peter.raich@xxxxxxxx>, <TresCeeA@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: 46 DAYS TILL ELECTION DAY! - CAN WE PROTECT THE VOTE?
- From: "Pete Klammer" <pklammer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:57:01 -0600
- Delivered-to: mailing list cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net
- In-reply-to:
- List-help: <mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net>
- List-post: <mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net>
- Mailing-list: contact cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net; run by ezmlm
- Organization: Klammer Family
- Reply-to: <pklammer@xxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcSeXjXNrQR1gutMTjymbTbhZC2TkAAGIvaAAAZ56DAAADPaMAACmGGg
I didn't know we could inquire about our absentee ballots being counted; I
thought that was only provided for provisional ballots.
--
Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE(SA,P1583), ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE)
3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452
(303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@xxxxxxx
"Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! "
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alkolwicz [mailto:alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 3:52 PM
> To: pklammer@xxxxxxx; 'Robert Mcgrath';
> cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx;
> cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx; donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx; mlambie@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> peter.raich@xxxxxxxx; TresCeeA@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: 46 DAYS TILL ELECTION DAY! - CAN WE PROTECT THE VOTE?
>
> Pete,
>
> I think that the number of ways that a provisional ballot can be
> disqualified is greater than the number of ways that an
> absentee ballot can
> be disqualified.
>
> To vote by absentee:
>
> 1. I would include a brief note stating my objection to DREs
> and having to
> resort to and absentee ballot.
>
> 2. I would check every single detail of the ballot and the
> return envelope.
>
>
> 3. I would then grudgingly hand-carry my voted absentee ballot and
> personally deposit it in the absentee ballot container,
> realizing that it
> might not be counted.
>
> 4. Then I would start making calls to the clerk's office --
> two or three
> times per day -- asking was my absentee ballot qualified for
> counting?
>
> 5. After the election results are posted, I would once again
> check with the
> clerk to see if my ballot was counted.
>
> 6. Finally, I would also write a letter to the editor
> criticizing the clerk
> and expressing my displeasure with DREs.
>
> Pardon the quickly phrased language.
>
> Al
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Klammer [mailto:pklammer@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 2:37 PM
> To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx; 'Robert Mcgrath';
> cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx; cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx; donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mlambie@xxxxxxxxxxx; PKlammer@xxxxxxx; peter.raich@xxxxxxxx;
> TresCeeA@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: 46 DAYS TILL ELECTION DAY! - CAN WE PROTECT THE VOTE?
>
> By "vote in person on a paper ballot" are you still excluding
> provisional
> ballot?
>
> --
> Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE(SA,P1583), ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE)
> 3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452
> (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@xxxxxxx
> "Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! "
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alkolwicz [mailto:alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 12:35 PM
> > To: 'Robert Mcgrath'; cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx; cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> > donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx; mlambie@xxxxxxxxxxx; PKlammer@xxxxxxx;
> > peter.raich@xxxxxxxx; TresCeeA@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: 46 DAYS TILL ELECTION DAY! - CAN WE PROTECT THE VOTE?
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > I think that you understand that votes on absentee ballots
> > are counted, in
> > those counties that use optical scan at all, using the optical scan
> > equipment.
> >
> > I hope that you correct your promotional materials to remove
> > the suggestion
> > that people who have a chance to vote in person on a paper
> > ballot should
> > vote absentee.
> >
> > People might be better off voting absentee than they are
> > voting by DRE. But
> > they are not better off voting absentee when they can vote
> > early or in their
> > precinct using a true paper ballot.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Al
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Mcgrath [mailto:mcgrath_mcnally@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 8:35 AM
> > To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx; cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx; cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx; donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > mlambie@xxxxxxxxxxx; PKlammer@xxxxxxx; peter.raich@xxxxxxxx;
> > TresCeeA@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: 46 DAYS TILL ELECTION DAY! - CAN WE PROTECT THE VOTE?
> >
> > Al,
> >
> > We have been unable to figure out how to get the county
> > election officials
> > to offer paper ballots in precincts where DRE's are used. We
> > have heard
> > stories of how central tabulators in precincts using optical
> > scanners can
> > just as easily be corrupt. I am willing to let voters who
> > vote on paper and
> >
> > have that optically scanned continue to do so, but it
> > continues to be a risk
> >
> > relative to whether there is any chance for audits of those
> > optical scans.
> > 50 pre-selected ballots compared against optical scanners
> is hardly a
> > significant comparison, but that is what they've reduced us to.
> > >
> > >Bob,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >You are making a big mistake encouraging voters, who have
> > the option to
> > >vote
> > >on a paper ballot in their precinct, to vote by absentee
> > instead. Many of
> > >them will lose their vote altogether.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >For voters who have the choice of voting using a paper
> > ballot in their
> > >precinct or in an early voting location - they should do so.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Al
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Al Kolwicz
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >CAMBER
> > >
> > >Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results
> > >
> > >2867 Tincup Circle
> > >
> > >Boulder, CO 80305
> > >
> > >303-494-1540
> > >
> > >AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz
> > >
> > >http://coloradovoter.blogspot.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > >From: Mcgrath, Bob___PAIC_Mkt [mailto:bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > >Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 4:37 PM
> > >To: Mcgrath, Bob___PAIC_Mkt
> > >Subject: 46 DAYS TILL ELECTION DAY! - CAN WE PROTECT THE VOTE?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Weekly Newsbrief
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Two events You Can Support:
> > >
> > >Sunday, Sept. 26 - "Just Desserts" Forum features Films & Desserts
> > >
> > >Arvada United Methodist Church, 68th & Carr St.,
> > 303-421-5135, 7:00 - 9:00
> > >p.m.
> > >
> > >"Trouble in Paradise" & "Invisible Ballots" Movies & Q&A on
> > Protect Your
> > >Vote
> > >
> > >Come see Trouble in Paradise, a movie detailing the problems
> > continuing in
> > >Florida in the 2002 elections, showing why fair elections in
> > 2004 may not
> > >be
> > >possible. This will be followed by clips from Invisible
> > Ballots, a film
> > >produced by True Vote Maryland, a citizens activist group
> similar to
> > >Coloradoans for Voting Integrity, detailing the problems
> > with electronic
> > >voting machines. Desserts and coffees, teas and other
> > refreshments will be
> > >provided with time to meet and discuss the films. We will
> > be asking people
> > >to support the Sept. 29th rally.
> > >
> > >Wednesday, Sept. 29 - "Don't Let the Computer Eat Your Vote" Rally
> > >
> > >West Steps, State Capitol, downtown Denver, 12 noon - 1:00 p.m.
> > >
> > >Come join with other citizens to express your desire for
> trustworthy
> > >elections in November. We will be asking for voter
> verifiable paper
> > >ballots
> > >with 1% automatic manual audits of all machine-counted
> > ballots, to ensure
> > >there are no opportunities for malfunctions or malfeasance
> > in this year's
> > >critically important elections. Come hear various political
> > candidates
> > >from
> > >major parties discuss their support of verifiable voting and
> > sign a pledge
> > >for trustworthy elections. Co-sponsored by the Coloradoans
> > for Voting
> > >Integrity and the Rocky Mt. Peace & Justice Center of Boulder.
> > >
> > >This critical election, 1/3 of Colorado voters will use
> > insecure electronic
> > >machines with no possibility of recount. Many others will
> > have their votes
> > >counted by optical scan machines, which are subject to the
> > same problems of
> > >error and fraud as electronic voting machines. The
> > Secretary of State has
> > >ignored the petitions of 14,000 Coloradoans for
> voter-verified paper
> > >ballots
> > >in all elections. We demand paper ballots, hand counted.
> > Please come out
> > >and
> > >help protect our elections. Carpool from Boulder at Table
> > Mesa Park and
> > >Ride
> > >at 11 a.m.(Table Mesa Road I-36). For more information, call
> > >303-444-6981x5.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >For more info on this issue, go to
> > >http://www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/hr2239_volunteers/Int
> > roduction-5-pa
> > g
> > >es.pdf or to www.cfvi.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Other Actions:
> > >
> > >CFVI has explored legal action but has been unable to pursue
> > a lawsuit due
> > >to unavailability of Colorado-based facts with which to
> bring such a
> > >preliminary injunctions. Our actions will instead now
> focus upon our
> > >HOTLINE, collecting HAVA COMPLAINTS, ruthlessly pursuing MEDIA AND
> > >ADVERTISING, and building COALITION WITH OTHER GROUPS.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >We are now in need of funds to execute an ad campaign about
> > our hotline and
> > >to educate the public about verifiable voting in Colorado.
> > We have tried
> > >approaching the media and they have turned a deaf ear or
> > have mocked our
> > >efforts as that of "whiners, critics, liberals and
> > progressives who don't
> > >understand the security measures already in place by our
> > great leaders."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >We have been meeting weekly for the past month, developing outreach
> > >campaigns to county election officials, to political candidates in
> > >Colorado,
> > >and pursuing our U.S. Congressional representatives. We can
> > still use your
> > >help in telephone or personal follow-up to the information
> > packets that
> > >have
> > >already been sent to over 350 individuals who can make a
> > difference by
> > >speaking out or by opting to offer voters a choice of paper
> > ballots in the
> > >polling place. If you can help make phone calls or talk to
> > any of these
> > >candidates or county election officials, we NEED YOU!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Our Current Advice:
> > >
> > >Due to our inability to halt the use of un-auditable
> > electronic voting
> > >machines, and due to our inability to call for a
> > statistically significant
> > >manual audit of all optical scanners, we are calling on
> all Colorado
> > >citizens to do the following:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >1. Vote absentee. Order your absentee ballot by October 3rd.
> > >
> > >2. Cast your absentee ballot IN PERSON, AND AS LATE AS
> > POSSIBLE (THE DAY
> > >BEFORE OR THE DAY OF THE ELECTION).
> > >
> > >3. Encourage everyone you know to NOT vote early or vote
> in precinct
> > >voting.
> > >If someone misses the absentee deadline, have them vote
> provisional.
> > >
> > >4. Those voters voting provisional should go to the precinct
> > location and
> > >submit themselves WITHOUT ID so they will be given a
> > provisional paper
> > >ballot. Those people will be given a phone number to call
> > to see if their
> > >ballot was counted within 12 days after the election. Due
> > to the extremely
> > >tight races in this year's elections, it is likely that
> > there will be court
> > >challenges over provisional ballots, but at least they will
> > be on paper.
> > >
> > >5. If you must vote on a machine, or if you are given a
> > paper ballot to be
> > >optically scanned, again, try to vote provisional. Optical scanner
> > >tabulation software can just as easily be hacked into or
> > compromised as the
> > >electronic voting machines.
> > >
> > >6. If you experience or know of anyone who experiences any
> > problems in
> > >voting on election day, we will be providing a voter hotline
> > to call with
> > >such reports. There is also a Protect the Vote Hotline
> > operated by People
> > >for the American Way. Both hotlines will be advertised and
> > promoted via
> > >the
> > >media before and during election day.
> > >
> > >7. We will be facilitating election complaints using the
> > Help America Vote
> > >Act provisions. Stay tuned for details on this.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >This is the election of our lifetime. Please vote as if
> > your life, and the
> > >life of our democracy, depends upon it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Bob McGrath, Director
> > >Coloradoans for Voting Integrity
> > >355 Teller Ste 200
> > >Lakewood, CO 80226
> > >Tel. 303.231.1031
> > > <http://www.cfvi.org> http://www.cfvi.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>