RE: [Fwd: RE: CO SoS to reject Provisional Ballots? WELL DUH!]

["Pete Klammer" <pklammer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm afraid, Mr. Christian, you may have been pranked.

 

An "ad hominem" attack would be some kind of public statement against your person, which I have not done.

 

Please do not air your embarrassments at my expense.

--
Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE(SA,P1583), ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE)
   3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452
 (303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@xxxxxxx
   "Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! "

 

---

From: Christian Rudolph [mailto:reindeer@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 1:04 AM
To: CVV
Subject: [Fwd: RE: CO SoS to reject Provisional Ballots? WELL DUH!]

Pete Klammer wrote to me and said:

-----Forwarded Message-----

From: Pete Klammer <pklammer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: reindeer@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: CO SoS to reject Provisional Ballots? WELL DUH!
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:04:59 -0600

I don't mean to insult you, merely your intelligence.
-----------------------------------------------------

Mr. Klammer,

Can you please explain your ad hominem attack on me, yet again, for a second time?
It has no logic or reason, and I can't understand for the life of me why such an obviously
intelligent human would ruthlessly attack someone who is not his enemy, and is, in fact,
on the same side on many issues, including this one.
It makes no sense.

I would respectfully suggest that since you know nothing whatsoever of me,
that you could not possibly be using logic or data to back up your ridiculously angry and
blatantly false assertion. 

If you want to vent your rage, do it with someone else or get some form of therapy.
I am not your problem.

I will be creating a procmail filter just for you, Mr. Klammer, so you can save your
pathetic responses.  I won't be reading them, and you will only further annoy those
on the list that are not already annoyed with you, if there are any.

-Christian