Evidence of a Stolen election?

[Evan Daniel Ravitz <evan@xxxxxxxx>]

Anybody know if this is right?

Evan

<http://www.rense.com/general59/steI.HTM>http://www.rense.com/general59/steI.HTM

Rense.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed - The Stealing Of
Another Election
11-3-4

Democratic Underground.com

EarlG (xxx posts) Wed Nov-03-04 02:57 AM

Kerry winning Exit Polls - FRAUD LOOKS PROBABLE

SoCalDem has done a statistical analysis...

...on several swing states, and EVERY STATE that has EVoting but no
paper trails has an unexplained advantage for Bush of around +5% when
comparing exit polls to actual results.

In EVERY STATE that has paper audit trails on their EVoting, the exit
poll results match the actual results reported within the margin of
error.

So, we have MATCHING RESULTS for exit polls vs. voting with audits

vs.

A 5% unexplained advantage for Bush without audits.

Maybe Dubayah believes God will see him through this, but it's going
to take more than blind faith to pull the wool over the data and the
facts.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 12:42 AM by SoCalDemocrat
EDIT:

Analysis of the polling data vs actual data and voting systems
supports the hypothesis that evoting may be to blame in the
discrepancies. Nevada has evoting but with verified receipts. In that
state the Exit Polling matches the actual results within .1%
accuracy. However for other swing states Bush has unexplainable leads.

I'm still compiling data. Please help me determine what voting
methods are being used in swing states and which are evoting without
audit trails. Post your data under the individual state responses
below.

-------------------------------------------

Kerry is well ahead in exit polls, but still losing the counts. WTH
is going on?

Kerry is well ahead in Exit Polling in Ohio. We're being screwed.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/O...

Male: 51/49 Kerry 47%
Female: 53/47 Kerry 53%

Dem: 91/8 Kerry 38%
Rep: 94/6 Bush 37%
Ind: 60/39 Kerry 24%


Here is exit polling for Florida (3,824,794 votes for Kerry & Bush)

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/F...

Male: 52/47 Kerry 46%
Female: 52/48 Kerry 54%

Dem: 86/13 Kerry 38%
Rep: 92/7 Bush 39%
Ind: 60/38 Kerry 23%

3,824,794 votes for Kerry & Bush
2065388 Women (54% of total)
1759405 Men (46% of total)

Bush leads male vote by 5% of M = 87970

Kerry leads female vote by 4% of M = 82615

That means Bush is ahead by just 5355 votes in exit polling in FL.

Another odd thing is that there are more Reps then Dems in Florida by
1%, which is not expected. Either there are more voting Republicans
in FL than Democrats, a first and not matching known statistics, or
more Republicans were exit polled than Democrats. If the exit poll is
off by just 1% that's a difference of 382479 more voters who are
Democracts.

The results being posted however show Bush ahead 326,000 actual
votes. This is simply not possible from the exit polling numbers.
Even skewed for a 5% higher Republican vs. Democrat turnout from
2000, it doesn't add up.


WISCONSIN:

Kerry leads Female voters by 7%, Bush leads male voters by 7%. Male
vs. Female voter turnout is 47% M, 53% F. That means Kerry
statistically has a 7% edge in exit polling in Wisconsin.

Actual results however show Bush ahead by 1%, an unexplained difference of 8%.

NEVADA:

Just checked, same pattern. Kerry leads in the exit polls by a clear
margin, but is still behind in the reported results. This state is
even closer. Actual is just 1% favor of Bush. Exit polls show Kerry
with a wider margin. Women favored Kerry by 8% here out of 52% of
total voters. Men favored Bush by just 6% out of 48% of total voters.
Actual reported results don't match exit polling AT ALL in Nevada.

*** KERRY leads by 1.3% in exit polls in NV ***

Can someone determine what percentage of precincts are DIEBOLD or
electronic voting machines in these swing states? Of those compare
the expected voting results from Male vs. Female against the results
reported by electronic vs. non-electronic voting places.

My HYPOTHESIS is we will find a discrepancy in the electronic systems
vs. the exit polls and the non-electronic systems.

ttp://www.democraticunderground.com
/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&add
ress=132x1295396



How The Election Was Stolen

 From Roz Hill
roz_hill_2u@xxxxxxxxxxx
11-3-4

I watched the election results all night and into this morning. There
are some very important issues to share.

One is the surprise expressed by the pundits wherein they acknowledge
that the massive voter drives were propelled by discontent. So how
did the most hated occupant of the White House manage to exceed his
45% poll average to now claim he has a huge "popular" win.

We are told that 22% voted on "morality" and that Bush took 80% of
that 22%, and that is how he won. However, that leaves 78% who were
focused on Kerry issues. Why aren,t we told the percentages of the
78%???

The second surprise for the media was that the results didn,t match
the exit polls AT ALL. The media has gracefully claimed they "just
got it wrong." You remember we didn,t have exit pollsters in 2002. It
saved any disagreement with THAT Republican "sweep." In fact, the
pollsters have always been 100% accurate, with just 1 to 2% polling
data, in legitimate elections. Bush took the Texas governorship from
Ann Richards when she had a 70% approval rating. Is it magic?

My "I TOLD YOU SO" is that I have SCREAMED since 2000 that if we
don,t get rid of touch-screen "voting" computers, NOTHING, NOTHING,
NOTHING else will matter.

So, here are the numbers (so far): 112,596,922 voters counted in the
presidential race. Bush has been consistently polling at 45%, which
SHOULD have given him 50,668,614 votes, instead of 58,073,612. This
translates into 7,404,998 votes being siphoned off from Kerry votes.
Now, how does that magic work???

Taxpayers get hit with a bill for $3600 (or more) for EACH of the
touch-screen "voting" computers, which are nothing more than
dedicated COUNTERS except that they are marketed by Republicans (who
vowed to ensure Bush,s victory); and the American people have not
been allowed to examine or certify the software in these units.

Here is how easy it is to "make magic"

-- we need COUNTERS - (B) = Bush; (K) = Kerry; (V) = Vote; (T) = Tally

1. If V = B, add 1 to B
2. If T = 8, add 1 to B; Clear T; Skip 3
3. If V = K, add 1 to K; Add 1 to T

This extremely simple bit of programming would shift 12% of the vote
from Kerry to Bush, it would defy exit polls, and it would make it
look like Bush had a huge popular win. It is time that the software
in these SECRET Republican-owned computers be examined with a
deliberate check for instructions that could modify the vote tally.

Al-Qaeda has previously regarded the American people as victims of a
crooked election in 2000. Now they regard Americans as responsible
for letting this man -- who is regarded as the worst terrorist on the
planet continue his tyrannous regime. I doubt that the rest of the
world will accept four more years of his lies and looting.

Roz Hill