How can Neal say Boulder's election was accurate

[Evan Daniel Ravitz <evan@xxxxxxxx>]

I just heard Neal say on KGNU that he thought Boulder's election
seemed to be accurate.

How can you say that, Neal? You nor I nor anyone else but the
shadowy "certifiers" have ever looked at the software which does the
counting.

As Bev Harris said on KGNU this morning, there is NO way of knowing
what goes on in the "black boxes" which count our votes.

Again, you techies get so lost in the details of elections, you lose
track of the big picture.

As David Dill says, there is NO difference between elections counted
by secret software and elections counted by had secretly in locked
rooms by unaccountable people.

Why did you say that, Neal? Is someone pressuring you to be
reassuring to the sheep?

Evan

---------------------------------------------------------
Evan Ravitz          303 440 6838           evan@xxxxxxxx
Vote to Ratify the National Initiative at http://Vote.org
Photo Adventures:                         http://Vote.org/photos
Bush vs the Pope!                         http://Vote.org/Bush
Sins of the father Bush                   http://Vote.org/silence
NORAD's self-incriminating news release   http://Vote.org/911