[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Meaning of "AVVPAT" in P1583
Because some anti-paper cryptography zealots are on the committee, the names
and acronyms for voter-verified paper ballots have been extensively
masticated. Oh, and the disabled won't let anything pass that isn't equally
usable by the blind and the deaf. "AVVPAT" == Accessible Voter-Verified
Paper Audit Trail.
--
Pete Klammer, P.E. / ACM(1970), IEEE(SA,P1583), ICCP(CCP), NSPE(PE)
3200 Routt Street / Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-5452
(303)233-9485 / Fax:(303)274-6182 / Mailto:PKlammer@xxxxxxx
"Either Be Good, or Else Be Careful, but Do Have Fun! "
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul E Condon [mailto:pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 1:33 PM
> To: cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Hand Recounts of votes recorded on DREs
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:18:10AM -0800, Arthur Keller wrote:
> > At 11:14 PM -0800 12/6/04, David Aragon wrote:
> > >Barbara Simons wrote:
> > >
> > >> A "hand recount" of paperless DRE votes should come up with
> > >> the same tally that the DRE originally produced, unless the
> > >> DREs are really really broken.
> > >
> > >Clearly it can't detect errors in the recording of votes to
> > >produce the DRE output. But it can detect errors in the
> > >tallying of those outputs downstream of the DRE's -- which is
> > >certainly an area of concern and potential source of errors.
> >
> > It can also detect errors in the tallying of votes WITHIN the DREs.
> >
> > >So it's not pointless. But neither is it the end-to-end
> > >audit function that "hand recount", with its connotations
> > >of painstaking meticulousness, has formerly meant.
> >
> > Certainly it is better to have an AVVPAT for each DRE. But
> let hand
> > recounts of DREs go forward with the painstaking auditing
> process if
> > there's a chance it's not pointless. We don't want election
> > officials deliberately avoiding a great deal of effort by choosing
> > DREs without AVVPATs. Be careful what you wish for, you just might
> > get it.
>
> Please excuse a question whose answer is obvious to most everyone
> on this list: What does AVVPAT stand for?
>
> --
> Paul E Condon
> pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>