Okay – show me the typo (scroll down).
There isn’t one.
The word ‘November’ appears once in the
sentence, which is all it needs to.
If there had been a comma the first appearance of the word ‘year’, then
a second occurrence of the word ‘year’ might be
warranted.
This was written by lawyers. Lawyers tend
to create the world’s longest run on sentences. It is simple and I understand
what it says. Calling it the ‘other issue’ means to me that you don’t know
what it says, or what it is about.
This is about coordinated elections. If
this does not pass then Boulder may very well have to have a separate election
from the county. This is very costly and really quite
pointless.
I urge everyone in COB to understand what
this issue is about and vote you opinion accordingly. And if you still don’t
get it, then OVERVOTE your ballot to prevent
fraud.
Paul
Tiger
PS: this was a snipe hunt. Thanks so much
for enabling me to completely waste my time looking into this (albeit I had a
very pleasant chat with Alisa Lewis, whom you could have called on your
own).
-----Original
Message-----
From: Alisa
Lewis
AMENDMENT
OF THE MUNICIPAL GENERAL ELECTION DATE TO CONFORM WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE
STATE OF
COLORADO
Shall
Section 22 of the Charter be amended to change the date of the general
municipal election from the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November
of each odd-numbered year to the first Tuesday in each odd-numbered year in
order to allow Boulder elections
to conform with the dates specified in the Constitution of the State of
Colorado?
For the
measure ________
Against the measure ________