[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Brad Blog: St Louis County Rejects Diebold ( + ES&S info )

To: "Citizens for Verifiable Voting" <cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Brad Blog: St Louis County Rejects Diebold ( + ES&S info )
From: "Joe Pezzillo" <jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:33:03 -0700
Delivered-to: mailing list cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net
List-help: <mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net>
List-post: <mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net>
List-subscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net>
Mailing-list: contact cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net; run by ezmlm


Hot on the heels of Florida, California and North Carolina.

Near the end, this article also raises some questions about ES&S andthe pricing of the AutoMark units:


Amidst Intense Last-Minute Drama, St. Louis County Rejects Diebold!

Citizen Activists, Increasing Concerns about Diebold Security,Company Integrity Said to Have Been Key to Decision!


http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002189.htm

Prev by Date: Comments on Boulder RFP for voting system due Wednesday!!
Next by Date: Wired: Diebold Hack Hints at Wider Flaws
Previous by thread: Comments on Boulder RFP for voting system due Wednesday!!
Next by thread: Wired: Diebold Hack Hints at Wider Flaws
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread