[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Elections RFP



Title: Greetings to the BoCC,

Greetings to the BoCC,

 

Fellow ERC members have been weighing in on the latest RFP from the elections division. I suspect that most people are responding via the web form on the clerk’s site. Having had enough experience with the technical failures of the county’s web mechanisms and lack of candor from the clerk’s office, I choose to respond to the request for comment directly to you via email. I have little doubt that you will receive this.

 

There’s no doubt that I am a tech weenie, and have been critical of the defense of the present system in use by the clerk for elections. I am critical not only of the defense of the systems, but the systems themselves. The ERC was not of my making or under my control, and it as a whole was also critical of both of these things.

 

I believe that the pattern of ill-conceived ideas may well continue, as it is evident that the clerk was not impressed by the work of the ERC to sufficiently address our concerns and that of the interested and knowledgeable persons involved.

 

While I am a proponent of vote centers, I am not a proponent of DRE or electronic systems that obscure rational methods. In order to have trust in the outcome of any election we must have a clear understanding of what is taking place within the process, procedures, and electronic systems. Before any such methods can be used in the real world they must be engineered for success. This entails design and testing. When designs fail to achieve an expected outcome during testing, then we circle back to the drawing board and re-commence the work.

This is part and parcel of a total quality system.

 

Once the factors to create success are known to the designers and end-users of any system have been established, the consumers of said systems can create a list of specifications necessary. I see little in the way of such a list in this RFP.

 

It appears that once again we will rely upon vendors to tell Boulder County how to run an election. It will be up to them to tell us what is possible; how much time it will take; and how they can indemnify themselves when their systems fail to achieve the rather blurry goals.

 

The ERC suggested bringing in an outside consultant to help in formulating a true quality model. The clerk chose to simply replace the elections manager with someone better versed in elections law and practice than the previous manager. While he may fit the bill in respect to his skills, he is not a designer of technical systems, nor is he qualified to create a quality model. In point of fact, there is no one in the clerk’s office that has such proven skills.

 

It is a mistake to run off to the vendors of elections systems and ask them to design our system. Their goals are to increase their bottom line while maintaining supremacy of market share through secrecy and proprietary methods.

Our goals are transparent, efficient, and reliable elections.

 

My hope is that our county funds will not be spent on irresponsible nonsense from those that have no investiture in the democratic republic of which Boulder County is (still) a part of.

 

Paul Tiger, Publicity Director of the Libertarian Party of Boulder County
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
303-774-6383 voice and messages
720-323-0570 cell
www.LPBoulder.org

"The government that governs best, governs least."

                            Thomas Jefferson