[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

reliability tests on Diebold, Hart, Sequoia voting machines

To: attendees@xxxxxxx, cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: reliability tests on Diebold, Hart, Sequoia voting machines
From: Margitjo@xxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:34:55 EST
Delivered-to: mailing list cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net
List-help: <mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net>
List-post: <mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net>
List-subscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net>
Mailing-list: contact cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net; run by ezmlm

Here is an article on testing reliability of various voting machines of Diebold, Hart, and Sequoia. Only one machine met the federal reliability standard, yet was still only 30% as reliable as an incandescent light bulb.

Margit

http://www.votetrustusa.org/pdfs/BatchTestReliability.pdf

Follow-Ups:
- Understanding What Voting Machine MTBF Means for Democracy
  - From: stith

Prev by Date: Re: RFP Evaluation Team NDA
Next by Date: Fwd: [ELECTION_CO] Fwd: EXCLUSIVE: New Voting Machine Company Whistleblower Comes Forward!
Previous by thread: CAMBER questions Proposal Evaluation Committee
Next by thread: Understanding What Voting Machine MTBF Means for Democracy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread