[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Boulder County Must Read: BradBlog: Hart Intercivic whistle blower alleges criminal fraud




Wow, if this is true, it's pretty damning, this guy was apparently a "technical specialist" for Hart and now works in Tarrant County, Texas' elections office, where they just had a major failure of their Hart system last week. Do we have any investigative reporters left in Boulder who can look into this? Maybe this is more like a law enforcement detective effort? Isn't part of Hart's company based here? Maybe asking for that refund isn't such a bad idea after all? -Joe


http://www.bradblog.com/archives/00002542.htm

<bradblog>

"A review of several notarized letters sent by Singer to officials in both Texas and Ohio in 2004 warned of fraudulent activities, buggy software and hardware, dysfunctional testing and development procedures, unsecured working environments and possible criminal behavior by both Hart InterCivic and Election Workers in both states."

[...]

The letter to Blackwell includes several other remarkable passages including descriptions of what he "believed to be criminal fraud." Here's one such passage:

"I have been fervently hoping that Hart would decide to step forward and do the right thing; to break the industries habit of silence and concealment, and admit to wrongdoing and apologize for their mistakes.
...
Had this been a handful of rare incidents, where the repercussions were indeed minor, I could have continued to believe that Hart as a company was doing the right thing. I eventually left Hart Intercivic because it became clear to me that the company's silence had little to do with "rare" incidents but instead revealed a number of potentially serious problems which appeared to be systematically hidden or ignored largely for the sake of corporate profits. While at Hart I had evidence of what I believed to be criminal fraud, extreme negligence, and a distinct and troubling pattern of failure to uphold the public trust both in violations of the spirit of its contracts, but also in concealing problems in an industry which so crucially represents the public interest."

</bradblog>