Attached is a new version of the RFPET Recommendation which has searchable/copyable text. I don't yet see it at the clerk's web site http://www.co.boulder.co.us/clerk/elections/index.htm It is a shame to see the committee not require that the system comply with Colorado law (by producing auditable results) and rush ahead in the face of so many problems. And the 'bait and switch' from a rental to suggesting that it be bought is a real end-run around the democratic process. We haven't seen the price yet, but the county should offer the same possibility to other bidders and start the RFP process over, with specific invites to ballot marking vendors and demands that the Secretary of State should certify ballot marking equipment like other states do. Neal McBurnett http://bcn.boulder.co.us/~neal/ Signed and/or sealed mail encouraged. GPG/PGP Keyid: 2C9EBA60
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Neal McBurnett" <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Need useable version of RFPET Recommendations
- From: "Liss, Josh" <jliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:26:12 -0700
- Cc: "Bailey, Shelley" <sbailey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: neal@bcn.boulder.co.us
- Disposition-notification-to: "Liss, Josh" <jliss@co.boulder.co.us>
- Thread-index: AcZSfPkbHlIkYJr6QN+JhiF3gJWqRwAx+BGQ
- Thread-topic: Need useable version of RFPET Recommendations
Here ya go, Neal... -----Original Message----- From: Neal McBurnett [mailto:neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:33 AM To: Bailey, Shelley; Liss, Josh Subject: Need useable version of RFPET Recommendations Public information should be easy to work with. But the only version I've seen of the RFPET Recommendations has the same problem that we protested about the RFP back in December - it is in an image format, so we can't search the text. Nor can text be copied and pasted to our responses. This is unacceptable because it makes it unnecessarily difficult to even check whether critical issues like are included. It similarly makes it difficult for the public to comment. This is improper for any government document. In contrast, e.g., the state of Massachusetts is about to require that all government documents be produced in the Open Document standard. Boulder should follow that lead, and require it of its contractors also. As you did with the RFP, please re-issue the recommendations in a form that can be easily searched for keywords, and from which text can be copied and pasted. Thank you, Neal McBurnett http://bcn.boulder.co.us/~neal/ Signed and/or sealed mail encouraged. GPG/PGP Keyid: 2C9EBA60Attachment: RFPET Recommendations.pdf
Description: RFPET Recommendations.pdf
--- End Message ---