Re: Did Linda Salas Lie to Boulder County?

[kellen carey <kcarey636@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for info, Ralph and Evan.

So it isn't clear if the Hart paper ballots would be legally viable in a recount?  (Not that 5" wide and  2' long ballots of tiny print, spooled paper are handcount-friendly anyway...)

Congress has thrown away its prerogative to declare war or even enforce its own laws against the executive... by 2008 we will owe China, Japan, and the EU around $9 trillion... absolutely nothing whatsoever being done about global warming... voting equipment completely lacking transparency and verifiability.  A nation of sheep...

kell

Evan Daniel Ravitz <evan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  On Fri,
>  7 Apr 2006, Ralph Shnelvar wrote:
>
> > I believe that the Clerk is relying (uh, re-lying?) on some vague verbal
> > assurance from the SOS.  Since the SOS cannot (should not) unilaterally
> > change statute, ...
> >
> > But, hey, the SOS changed the meaning of the state constitution. So what's a
> > little statute among cronies?
>
> Priceless!
>
> Statute? We don't need no stinkin' statute!
>
>
> Evan

 "Sapere Aude."  Have courage to use your own reason.  Kant

---

Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.