[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NEWS about the voting equipment decision



Here’s a set of news stories about the voting equipment trial.

 

 

 

Al Kolwicz

CAMBER – Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx

www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz

www.coloradovoter.blogspot.com

 

CAMBER is a dedicated group of volunteers who are working to ensure that every voter gets to vote once, every vote is counted once, and that every ballot is secure and anonymous.

 

 

 

--- Begin Message ---

Publish Date: 9/22/2006

Candidates say voting security a priority

By John Fryar

DENVER — Both men seeking to be Colorado’s next secretary of state said Thursday that they’d put a high priority on ensuring the security and integrity of the systems used by counties to record and count votes.

Secretary of State Gigi Dennis “didn’t follow the law” in certifying some of the electronic voting machines that several counties are to use in this year’s elections, charged Ken Gordon, the Democratic candidate for that office.

“She needed to hire an expert in information technology or computers. She didn’t,” Gordon said.

GOP candidate Mike Coffman said that if he’s elected, the first thing he’ll do “is basically start from scratch” and re-evaluate every type of machine that fellow Republican Dennis’ staff has approved.

He said if defects are found, “then I will de-certify” the faulty machines, and those machines could no longer be used until the problems are corrected.

Gordon and Coffman made their observations during a Thursday morning taping of KBDI TV’s “Aaron Harber Show,” which is to be broadcast on Channel 12 at 9:30 tonight.

That taping coincided with the second day of a Denver District Court hearing of a lawsuit that seeks to bar the use of specific models of computerized voting machines in the November election.

Gordon said the secretary of state’s office staffer who tested the machines was unqualified and relied on vendors’ assurances about their equipment.

“Some of these machines need some protocols to make sure that they’re handled in a way that they can’t be hacked or negligently cause them to lose votes,” Gordon said.

Coffman, however, said there might be practical problems if the Denver judge bars the use of the machines in question.

“I am concerned whether or not there’s backup systems that could get this election done,” Coffman said.

John Fryar can be reached by e-mail at jfryar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Title: DailyCamera: State/west
 
 

DailyCamera
 
To print this page, select File then Print from your browser
 
Judge allows voting machines for Nov.

By Associated Press
September 23, 2006

DENVER — Elections officials planned to work through the weekend to come up with plans to ensure that the state's new computerized voting machines are closely watched leading up to November's election.

A judge on Friday rejected a push by a handful of voters to stop the use of the machines after they presented evidence from computer experts that their software hasn't been rigorously tested and could be hacked to switch voters' choices without detection. The devices record a voter's selection electronically inside the machine.

Denver District Judge Lawrence Manzanares faulted the state for failing to come up with minimum security standards, as required by law, to make sure that the machines weren't vulnerable to fraud. But with election day only six weeks away, and early voting set to start Oct. 23, he said switching to a different voting method now was riskier than allowing the machines to be used.

Boulder County elections coordinator Josh Liss said he was relieved to hear his team could continue preparing for Nov. 7 as planned.

"It's a big win, especially for the community of voters with disabilities," Liss said.

Although the machines have been criticized by some election watchdogs, Liss said his office has received positive feedback from disabled voters. Boulder County leased 219 electronic voting machines for $1.7 million this summer to meet new federal requirements allowing disabled people to cast ballots without help.

They were used for the first time in the August primary election.

Now that the county has the go-ahead to use the electronic equipment this fall, Liss said he plans to ask commissioners next week for permission to get 31 more machines before November.

Judge Manzanares on Friday ordered the state to work with the counties on a plan to make sure the controversial machines are closely monitored before and during voting. But after the election, he said the old standards should be scrapped, new rules drawn up and then used to re-evaluate the four kinds of machines approved for use in Colorado.

Liss said he'll be relieved to have some direction, but he'd like to continue with the electronic equipment.

"They worked fine for us in August," he said.

Secretary of State Gigi Dennis said officials would review the security plans submitted by the counties, looking for strategies to be implemented across the state.

"I want to assure the voters that the machines are safe, their votes are secure, that they need to feel confident about their vote, and I encourage them to vote in November," said Dennis, who is not running for election.

After the election, deputy secretary of state Bill Hobbs said he thought the existing machines likely would be approved again, especially since their manufacturers regularly upgrade them.

But the two men running to replace Dennis — Democrat Ken Gordon and Republican Mike Coffman — said they would have to start from square one and make sure the machines were thoroughly tested.

Coffman also said voters could choose to vote absentee in the fall election if they don't feel confident in the new machines.

Gordon pointed out that the machines purchased this year will print out paper receipts, allowing voters to check their votes, because of a bill he sponsored in the state Senate. Counties have until the 2008 presidential election to add printers to older machines.

Nationwide, about 80 percent of voters are expected to use computerized voting machines in November's elections.

Voter Action, a nonprofit and nonpartisan group based in Berkeley, Calif., that supported the Colorado lawsuit, is involved in cases in four other states — California, Arizona, Pennsylvania and New York — but none of them will affect voting in this year's election, co-director Lowell Finley said.

His group favors the use of paper ballots that can then be counted by a scanner. Another machine can also be used by disabled people to mark a paper ballot, he said.

"The concern and our target is the 2008 election," he said.

Camera Staff Writer Vanessa Miller contributed to this report.

Copyright 2006, DailyCamera. All Rights Reserved.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

 

 

Election decision saves county roughly $1 million

 

Find this article at:
http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/content/news/stories/2006/09/23/9_23_1a_voting_machines.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Saturday, September 23, 2006

In a decision that could have forced Mesa County and other counties across the state to spend millions of dollars to replace their electronic voting machines before the November election, a Denver district judge said Friday the machines can remain in use.

Judge Lawrence Manzanares said in his decision the machines could be used in the upcoming election despite the “abysmal” job the state had done in testing the electronic voting machines. Additionally, he said the Colorado Secretary of State’s office broke state law by not instituting stringent enough security guidelines surrounding the machines.

His decision mandated that minimum security standards for the machines be instituted before the Nov. 7 election.

The lawsuit, filed in a Denver district court by several Colorado citizens backed by a national voter-rights organization in June, accused Colorado Secretary of State Gigi Dennis and nine county clerks of using four types of voting machines that were unreliable and open to tampering.

Dennis announced in a Friday afternoon news release that she will work with Colorado’s county clerks “to ensure that November elections are conducted in the fairest, most secure manner possible.”

“We share a common interest with all Colorado citizens to improve our elections,” Dennis said. “We are pleased the judge recognized the need to keep this year’s election moving forward, and we will work toward improving our rules and standards in this area.”

Though not a defendant in the lawsuit, Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Janice Ward-Rich said Manzanares’ decision came as a relief to her and the county.

Ward-Rich said in the event that Manzanares had outlawed the use of electronic voting equipment in the 2006 general election, the county would have had to incur “substantial cost,” approximately $1 million to replace the current system.

“Already this week, we had sat down and discussed alternatives, but no decision in concrete had been decided,” Ward-Rich said. “We had looked at all mail-in ballot should the judge have ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.”

Mesa County is one of several Colorado counties that exclusively uses electronic voting machines. Ward-Rich said the county has used the electronic voting machines since 2002.

The county’s voting machines came under fire earlier this month after it was revealed an official with the secretary of state’s office told a court in August he was pressured into certifying the county’s voting equipment.

John Gardner, the man appointed by the Colorado secretary of state to certify voting machines to be used in Colorado elections, told a Denver court Aug. 29 he was pressured into certifying machines used in Mesa and Jefferson counties, according to his court deposition.

Garner’s deposition came in preparation of the lawsuit Manzanares ruled on Friday.

In July, Manzanares declined to bar the voting machines from use in the primary election, but allowed the voter-rights lawsuit to move forward.

According to the deposition, Gardner was asked: “And the fact of the matter is, isn’t it, Mr. Gardner, that you were in a big hurry to certify the ES&S Unity system 3.0 because Jefferson County and Mesa County wanted to use it in the primary election?”

Gardner replied: “Yes, that’s sort of true.”

Gardner continued on to say the ES&S system did not meet the requirements laid out in state law. He said he had certified Mesa County’s equipment because of “pressure from Mesa County to get this done.”

Despite Gardner’s admission of improperly certifying Mesa County’s voting machines, documents the county filed with the secretary of state’s office earlier this year, randomly selected voting machines used in the August primary were found to be 100 percent accurate.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Title: Rocky Mountain News: Elections
 
 

Rocky Mountain News
 
To print this page, select File then Print from your browser
URL: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/elections/article/0,2808,DRMN_24736_5015947,00.html
Click here to view a larger image.
Linda McConnell © News

Plaintiffs' attorneys Andy Efaw, left, and Paul Hultin walk outside Denver District Court on Friday after a judge said the state did an "abysmal" job of testing security on voting machines but said it was too late to bar them from the Nov. 7 election. Hultin said he was pleased the judge said the state must do better.

Vote machines a go

Judge rips security testing, but says it's too late to switch

By Ann Imse, Rocky Mountain News
September 23, 2006

A Denver district judge ruled Friday that the secretary of state did an "abysmal" job of security testing on new computerized voting machines, but it's too late to bar them from the Nov. 7 election.

Unable to be certain the machines' software is safe from tampering that could distort the vote, Judge Lawrence Manzanares ordered the state to immediately devise detailed rules for counties to ensure that no one can get to the machines to reprogram them.

Plaintiffs showed malicious software could be installed with a screwdriver and a flash drive in as little as one minute on some machines, Manzanares noted.

He said the widely used voting machines, where voters cast ballots on a computer screen, "are certainly not perfect or immune from tampering." But he ruled that barring them roughly six weeks before the election, and four weeks before early voting, "could create more problems than it would solve."

Compared to the potential of tampering, "the potential for problems is probably greater" if counties must suddenly switch to a different voting system, the judge said in an oral ruling shortly after final arguments in the three-day trial.

Using all mailed or absentee ballots would violate another state law, he noted, because they could not be counted by precinct.

A nonpartisan voters group brought the lawsuit, asking for a ban on computer voting systems made by Diebold, Hart, ES&S and Sequoia. They are used in every county in Colorado to some degree, and extensively in many.

But devising serious security standards and then testing the machines again before November also is not realistic, the judge said. So he ordered the state to do that before the next statewide election, which could be as soon as November 2007.

State officials say they would be recertifying next year anyway, when the manufacturers update their software.

Both sides said they were pleased with the rulings.

Deputy Secretary of State Bill Hobbs was happy to not be scrambling to make major last-minute changes in the election.

Plaintiffs' attorney Paul Hultin was pleased that because the judge agreed that the state must do better security checks in the future.

Manzanares said the new security standards should be detailed, and the tests should be logged and repeatable.

"Good government requires those documents," he said.

"Measured by any security standard, the state has done an abysmal job of doing their tests" for security, he said.

In contrast, Secretary of State Gigi Dennis issued a statement saying she remains "confident with the state's certification process."

In a press release, she said, "I ask voters to ignore the political rhetoric by a few seeking to destroy that confidence."

The judge found other problems, but concluded he did not have the authority to rule on them, saying:

He "absolutely" wished the state had found an expert more qualified to test the machines but the state law was too vague about the "expert" needed.

Some non-security sections of the certification also were deficient - but not absent.

"The court can order the Secretary of State to comply with the law. The court cannot make the Secretary of State do a good job," Manzanares said.

Some machines clearly failed to meet all requirements for voting by the disabled, but he did not bar them. "They are better than most other methods," he decided.

Because the judge ruled the secretary failed to demand adequate security plans from counties, he ordered the state to produce new security rules for the counties and share them with the plaintiffs' attorneys by noon Monday.

The two sides hope to agree on the new rules and submit them to the judge for approval shortly thereafter, Hultin, the plaintiffs' attorney, said.

Dennis at first said she would start work on the rules "first thing Monday." After she was told the judge gave her a noon deadline, she said, "We'll work through the weekend."

Her deputy, Hobbs, said the office already has ideas for the new rules and would look at practices in California and other states.

The plaintiffs also argue that results should never be transmitted by the Internet but it remains to be seen if that will be included.

The Democratic Party, and both the Democratic and Republican candidates for secretary of state, suggested that voters cast absentee ballots, which are on paper.

Dennis, a Republican who was appointed secretary of state and is not running, disagreed.

"I think that is absurd. County clerks and recorders have always done a very efficient job in collecting votes."

Her advice to citizens hoping to ensure their choice counts? Make sure they vote. And take identification to the polls, Dennis said.

Voting machines statewide

County clerks now must wait for the secretary of state to detail rules on how to prevent voting machine tampering. Here's what some said when asked what their own plans are:

ADAMS COUNTY

Carol Snyder, clerk and recorder, said Adams County will do more extensive testing prior to the election than is required by law. Her office will make sure machines are tested in a "realistic" environment prior to the election. A number of security routines are completed before elections can begin, plus there's a post election audit - where the electronic vote results are compared with the paper audit trail of the ballots.

ARAPAHOE COUNTY

Nancy Doty, clerk and recorder, said the county has used DRE's voting machines for 20 years and never has had a problem. "So I am not concerned about using them in the November election. I am providing additional, hands-on election judge training for our new Edge II machines to ensure those people are well equipped with the knowledge to help run a successful election."

BOULDER COUNTY

Joshua Liss, elections coordinator, said all of Boulder's electronic voting machines have a voter-verifiable paper audit trail - a receipt that prints out of the machine, showing voters the selections they have made. They can verify these selections or make changes, and when they are ready to cast their ballot, the receipt stays with the machine. This receipt is used in post-election audits to ensure that the votes recorded on the machine match the votes verified by the voter on the paper. Liss said he believes a big concern now is trying to rebuild voter confidence: "Regardless of the court ruling, the most damaging affect of this case has been the seeds of doubt that may have planted in voters' minds about the electronic voting equipment."

DENVER COUNTY

Alton Dillard, communications director, said the county uses Sequoia Advantage and Edge voting machines, which are stand-alone units that cannot be hacked. Plus, the machines are stored in a secure warehouse and are checked prior to the opening of the polls to make sure they contain zero votes, have security seals intact and that the voter verifiable paper audit printers are secure. Anyone working on the voting machines in Denver must pass a CBI background check.

JEFFERSON COUNTY

Susan Miller, director of elections, stresses that Jeffco's equipment is completely "stand alone" and is not Web based. "Anyone who wanted to disrupt the election totals through a voting machine would have to go to all 324 precincts to physically access the machines," she said. "For the machines to be totally compromised - for the results to be lost or tampered with - the voter would have to take the machines apart and interfere with the internal workings of the machines. All of this would be in front of other voters and of course, the election judges."

or 303-954-5438

Copyright 2006, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights Reserved.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Title: Rocky Mountain News: Elections
 
 

Rocky Mountain News
 
To print this page, select File then Print from your browser
 
Click here to view a larger image.

Summer Lawless, a Republican voter, keeps a playful eye on her boys - Bradley, 4, left, and Easton, 2 - at the Jefferson County Open High School in Lakewood, which has become an important area for swing voters in this year's elections. For the most part, Denver's suburbs are neither Republican red nor Democratic blue - but solidly purple. Lawless supports President Bush and believes the war in Iraq is justified.

The power of purple

More unaffiliated suburbanites vote 'for the person' - not the red or blue

By Stuart Steers, Rocky Mountain News
September 23, 2006

Denver's populous suburban counties are in a state of flux, with changing political allegiances that have the potential to alter state politics. A surge in unaffiliated voter registration means that Denver's suburbs are now neither Republican red nor Democratic blue, but solidly purple.

At least for the most part.

Recent voter registration figures show that the number of Republican voters has declined during the past two years in every suburban county, while the number of unaffiliated voters has increased. The percentage of Democrats has remained roughly the same in most counties.

The percentage of voters who don't sign up with either party has jumped to 36 percent in Adams County, 39 percent in Boulder County, 36.3 percent in Broomfield and 32.8 percent in Jefferson County.

It's these suburban unaffiliated voters who will determine who becomes governor and which party controls the state legislature and the bulk of Colorado's congressional delegation.

"I vote for the person," said Jan Mullen, a Lakewood Republican who said she is increasingly disenchanted with her party. "I read all the junk about the candidates that comes in the mail."

Mullen, who lives in a swing district that could determine which party controls the state legislature, said she is barraged with mail that attacks candidates on both sides.

"It's upsetting . . .," she said.

For years Jefferson County was a Republican stronghold, but now most of the county's state legislators are Democrats. Republicans are still the largest bloc of voters, with 37.4 percent, but Jeffco may be Colorado's premier purple county.

"I don't think anybody could say it's a Republican county anymore," said Mary Alice Mandarich, a longtime Democratic activist who has worked on campaigns in the county for more than two decades. "The demographics and issues have changed."

Shifting political ground in suburbs

The suburbs' ticket-splitting ways became apparent in 2004, when Arapahoe, Jefferson and Broomfield counties voted to re-elect President Bush and to send Democrat Ken Salazar to the U.S. Senate. The suburbs' independent streak seems to have deepened since then, judging by the spike in unaffiliated voters.

While the decline in Republican registration has excited Democrats, their party has just held its own in the percentage of registered voters in most of the suburban counties. There is still a clear lead in Republican registration numbers in Arapahoe, Douglas, Jefferson and Broomfield counties.

"You don't see a surge in Democratic registration; what that suggests is these folks are willing to split tickets and look at the person," said Denver pollster Floyd Ciruli. "The Democrats still have to prove themselves."

For years, Colorado politicians have known that elections in this state are won and lost in the Denver suburbs. With 2 million residents, Denver's sprawling suburban counties easily outvote urban Denver and rural Colorado.

Once the political makeup of these counties was regarded as fairly fixed, with Boulder and Adams counties usually going Democratic, and Jefferson, Arapahoe and Douglas counties reliably Republican. The state GOP had a solid band of voters extending along the western and southern flank of the metro area that often helped Republican candidates coast to victory, but that seems to be changing.

Ciruli said the shifting political ground in the suburbs is driven by demographics. Most of the suburban counties have become more racially and economically diverse over the past few years.

Since 2000, U.S. Census Bureau figures show that the Hispanic population, in particular, has ballooned in the suburbs.

In Adams County, Hispanics went from 28 percent to 35 percent of the population, with 139,000 Hispanics now living there.

In Arapahoe County, the Hispanic population rose from 12 percent to 16 percent in the first half of this decade; the county now has 85,000 Hispanic residents. Smaller increases were recorded in the other suburban counties.

"The inner-ring, older suburbs like Lakewood, Aurora, Arvada and Wheat Ridge are getting more diverse with working-class and poorer people moving in," Ciruli said.

At the same time, many of the older suburbs have found themselves dealing with the same types of urban problems that Denver has faced for years.

"There's a blending of the needs and concerns of the inner suburbs and the inner city," said Ciruli, noting that the Republican mayors of Lakewood and Aurora now frequently work with Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, on a variety of issues.

"People like to think of the suburbs as wealthy, white and Christian - that's not the case at all," said Republican political consultant Katy Atkinson. "The suburbs have become very diverse.

"The conventional wisdom about the suburbs may be wrong."

Dems may catch a break

Atkinson said many suburbanites who voted Republican in past years may be willing to "give the Democrats a chance" this fall.

"People are on the fence," she said. "The Democrats haven't closed the deal. Republicans will have to work hard to get suburban votes."

The Republicans are strongest in the so-called "exurbs," low-density areas at the fringe of a big city. Douglas County may be the best example of a local exurban county, and Republicans still comprise just over 50 percent of the county's voters.

The change in party affiliation in suburban counties during the past two years may be linked to the increasingly unpopular war in Iraq.

Recent polling by the Rocky Mountain News and CBS 4 revealed that Colorado voters are upset about the war and unhappy with the status quo in Washington. Fifty-nine percent of voters surveyed disapproved of the job President Bush is doing. Several suburban voters interviewed by the News said they were unhappy with Bush.

"It feels like America is on its own," said Joseph O'Meara, a 39-year-old unaffiliated Centennial voter. "We've alienated most of the world. The president's address was another scolding to the international community, 'You're with us or against us.' "

Others fear that U.S. soldiers now find themselves in the middle of a civil war in Iraq.

"We got ourselves into a civil war, and we're never going to solve it," said Kristin Vasey, a 34-year-old Highlands Ranch Democrat. "We're trying to police the world."

National polls reveal that a crucial swing vote in this election are so-called "security moms," suburban mothers who voted to re-elect Bush because they thought he was the best candidate to deal with terrorism. Many of those women now say they've lost confidence in the president.

"Voting for Bush was a mistake," said Lisa Sanchez, of Lakewood, a 35-year-old unaffiliated voter and mother of two. "I won't be voting for the Republicans this time."

Others say they still believe in Bush's ability to take on the terrorists.

"I support our president," said Martha Gray, a 62-year-old Lakewood Republican. "I'd rather fight the terrorists over there than here. I think it's a situation that needs to be taken care of."

Many suburban voters also believe the economy is not doing as well as economic reports indicate. They say many employers are cutting back on health benefits and people are working longer hours to pay their mortgage.

"A lot of my friends are working 60 hours a week to maintain their lifestyle," said Hope Belloni, a 39-year-old unaffiliated Castle Rock voter. "$300,000 for a house is not affordable housing."

or 303-954-2282

Copyright 2006, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights Reserved.

GIF image


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 
denver & the west | election 2006
Vote won't be on paper
MACHINES OK'D FOR USE
By George Merritt
Denver Post Staff Writer
DenverPost.com

A judge Friday ruled the secretary of state failed to properly certify the security of Colorado's electronic voting machines but said they could be used in the November election.

Denver District Judge Lawrence Manzanares said the four kinds of electronic voting machines used in Colorado will have to go through a new certification process after the Nov. 7 election.

Manzanares also ordered Secretary of State Gigi Dennis to make sure counties had adequate security measures in place for the Nov. 7 election.

"Essentially, (Manzanares) decertified these machines after this election," plaintiff's attorney Andrew Efaw said after the ruling.

Officials in Dennis' office were quick to reassure voters that the machines they will use in this election - and which counties have spent millions of dollars buying - are secure and reliable. The judge reinforced that sentiment, saying his decision did not mean the machines are "unreasonably unreliable."

"I think the voters can be confident," Deputy Secretary of State Bill Hobbs said after the ruling. He emphasized there was no evidence of systemic problems in the voting machines during the August primary.

Still, in making his ruling, Manzanares said Dennis' office never created minimum security standards for the machines - as required by state law. And he said her office did an "abysmal" job of documenting testing during the certification process.

But he also said "decertifying all the machines in the state (before the November election) would create more problems than it would solve."

The decision was in response to a lawsuit that challenged the use of four brands of computerized voting machines in the state. Plaintiff's attorneys with the law firm Wheeler Trigg Kennedy alleged that the machines were not properly vetted before they were certified for use in the state.

The attorneys were asking for an injunction against the so-called "direct recording electronic" machines in the Nov. 7 election.

Even before Manzanares' decision, the case had sent ripples through the elections community. A week ago, the state Democratic Party urged voters to vote absentee and avoid using the machines.

And both candidates for secretary of state have criticized Dennis and her office.

On Friday, Republican candidate Michael Coffman applauded the judge's decision.

"Whatever questions exist now, had he disallowed the use of these electronic voting machines, it would have just thrown this election into chaos," he said.

And Democratic candidate Ken Gordon said security needs to be a priority in November.

"You need to treat these machines as if they are evidence in a murder case," he said.

Whatever happens next, both men agreed that much more will need to be done to restore voter confidence. But those problems may only be aggravated, given that experts testified that any closely contested race could wind up back in court because of the revelations of this case.

Plaintiff's attorney Paul Hultin also noted that the case may have ramifications across the country. He said the case has set precedent that federal tests on voting machines do not necessarily certify security.

The judge left one aspect of his ruling unfinished Friday. He and the attorneys are working on what security measures individual counties will have to take in November.

A decision on that is scheduled for Tuesday.

Staff writer George Merritt can be reached at 303-954-1657 or gmerritt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

Attachment: binSn1pwvsxsv.bin
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
  

Colo. Judge Warily OKs Voting Machines
By COLLEEN SLEVIN Associated Press Writer
DenverPost.com
DENVER-

A judge on Friday chastised state officials for botching efforts to ensure electronic voting machines are tamperproof but cleared them for use in the November election, saying it was too late now to change course.

Denver District Judge Lawrence Manzanares said the secretary of state's office had violated state law by failing to come up with minimum security standards for the machines. He added that the office had done an "abysmal" job documenting which tests were performed on the machines and should not have allowed computer manufacturers to vouch for the security of their own products.

The judge said, however, that he would not bar the machines with the election just six weeks away and county clerks warning they might not have time to print enough paper ballots.

"The risks of decertifying them are greater than the risks of not using them," the judge said.

Many of the machines will be used in Colorado's most populous counties during the general election Nov. 7. A lawsuit filed by a handful of voters claimed the machines were not secure, suggesting the accuracy of election results could be in jeopardy.

Manzanares said the secretary of state's office still must issue new security guidelines after the election.

For November, he ordered the state to work with counties to come up with a plan to make sure the machines are kept under close watch.

After the hearing, attorneys for both sides met behind closed doors to talk about possible solutions. The state will submit a plan on Monday and lawyers for the 13 voters who filed the lawsuit will weigh in on Tuesday.

"I want to assure the voters that the machines are safe, their votes are secure, that they need to feel confident about their vote, and I encourage them to vote in November," Secretary of State Gigi Dennis said.

The lawsuit, filed by 13 voters, sought to have four types of the machines barred from use.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued the machines can be easily manipulated to switch people's votes, that state officials didn't take adequate steps to test or secure the machines, and that the state was under pressure from county clerks to approve the machines quickly.

They also argued they are not easily accessible to voters with disabilities.

Lawyers for the secretary of state's office said the machines have been approved by independent laboratories endorsed by the government and were reviewed according to state law. They also said the machines will print receipt-like paper ballots that can be used in case of a recount or audit.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Attachment: bin4cJWe9Kfi0.bin
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Title: Voter Action | Home
 
 

   
 
 

 

Register

News
State Lawsuits
 

Video

Contact 
Links 
About



Voter Action is a not-for-profit organization that provides legal, research and organizing support to ensure election integrity in the United States.

Our current focus is to protect as many jurisdictions as possible from the acquisition and use of privatized, electronic voting systems which have been shown to have the most severe security risks and records of inaccuracy and unreliability.

Announcements

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
CONTACT: Connie Proulx
September 22, 2006
(303) 244-1919
(Via e-mail) proulx@xxxxxxxxxx

DENVER: Please be advised that closing arguments in the Conroy v. Ginette Dennis case regarding the Direct Recording Electronic ("DRE") voting machines are scheduled for today, September 22, at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Lawrence Manzanares in Denver District Court, Courtroom 1. The judge is expected to issue a ruling this afternoon. CO legal page

Arizona
September 14, 2006
Chavez Brewer Appeal |
click here

News

 

National

If Paper Ballots Restore Trust In Elections, Let's Switch
By Marc Fisher | Washington Post | September 21, 2006
Well into the second decade of the television era, the machines still conked out, a lot. "TV's on the fritz again," folks would say. There was such a thing as a TV repairman, who would come to your house. Now, TVs work. Here in the relatively early stages of the computer era, these vastly more complex machines still lock up and shut down. Yet we're so enraptured by computers' power that we want them to do everything -- even handle the sacred core of our democracy, voting.
Full Article | National news page

Ehrlich Wants Paper Ballots For Nov. Vote
State Election Chief Says Staff Toiling to Fix Electronic Glitches

By Christian Davenport and Ann E. Marimow | Washington Post Staff Writers| September 21, 2006
A week after the primary election was plagued by human error and technical glitches, Maryland Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) called yesterday for the state to scrap its $106 million electronic voting apparatus and revert to a paper ballot system for the November election. "When in doubt, go paper, go low-tech," he said. Full Article
| National news page

New Princeton University Study:
Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuVote-TS Voting Machine

This paper presents a fully independent security study of a Diebold AccuVote-TS voting machine, including its hardware and software. We obtained the machine from a private party. Analysis of the machine, in light of real election procedures, shows that it is vulnerable to extremely serious attacks. Full study | National news page | Video on DieboldAccuVote TS

Clerk: Voting Machines Not Accessible
By Mary L. Crider | AZ Times Record | September 19, 2006
County Clerk Doris Tate told the Sebastian County Election Commission she will refer a handicap accessibility problem with the new voting machines to Secretary of State Charlie Daniels. The new electronic iVotronics voting machines supplied by Election Systems and Software are not user-friendly for the visually or hearing impaired, she said. Full Article

Colorado

Vote machines come under late scrutiny
Electronic voting systems are being challenged in several states, including Colorado. Clerks believe they can safeguard the technology and security.
Editorial | The Denver Post | September 22, 2006
It's fair to say that voter confidence has waned since hanging chads, butterfly ballots and court orders settled the outcome of the 2000 presidential election. This year, some election experts are raising a red flag about the reliability of electronic voting machines that are being used in Colorado and elsewhere around the country, some for the first time. Some experts believe the new technology can fail or be tampered with - and manipulated to affect the results of an election. Full article | CO news

Computer expert faults voting machines approved for use in Colorado
By Colleen Slevin | Associated Press | September 20, 2006
A computer security expert testified Wednesday that studies have found electronic voting machines like those approved for Colorado's elections can be tampered with and reprogrammed in about a minute. Douglas Jones, a University of Iowa computer science professor, said Finnish computer expert Harry Hursti found problems with the Diebold TSX machine earlier this year in Utah. Full Article | CO news page

Suit targets voting machines
Complainants say computerized devices can be tampered with
By Ann Imse | Rocky Mountain News | September 20, 2006
Fear of fraud in the November election will be confronted head-on in a Colorado courtroom today when a lawsuit goes to trial on whether computerized voting machines should be banned because they are too susceptible to tampering.
The state will argue that voting on computer screens is safe because a person's ballot also is recorded on a printout, allowing spot checks for fraud and miscounts after the polls close. Full Story | CO news page

Lawyers Blast Electronic Voting Systems As Unreliable, Seek Ban
The Denver Channel | September 20, 2006
Thirteen Colorado voters who claim unsecure electronic voting machines threaten the integrity of elections will ask a judge to bar their use in November. The voters filed a lawsuit alleging the state failed to do legally required tests on the machines. "People were needed to stand up and say there's a problem with our election system and we need to fix it," said Arapahoe County voter Rochelle Dworet Cohen. Full Story | CO news page

Election '06 may be at risk of error A suit against the state is armed with tech experts saying the voting machines are vulnerable to fraud.
By Katy Human | Denver Post Staff Writer | September 19, 2006
A sharp thumbnail, a distracted poll worker or a determined hacker could undermine Colorado's 2006 election, according to two computer experts in a lawsuit challenging the state. The reports were done for the plaintiffs - 13 Colorado residents - and were released Monday. The lawsuit, which goes to trial Wednesday, alleges that four types of electronic voting machines used in the state are vulnerable to fraud and should not have been certified by the secretary of state's office.
Full Story | CO news page

New Concerns Raised About Voting Computers
Associated Press | September 15, 2006
Some voting computers were certified for use in Colorado after only about 15 minutes of security checks by an official with no formal training in computer science, according to a newly released deposition. The deposition intensified criticism of the systems that will be used in next month's elections. The state Democratic Party on Thursday urged voters to use absentee ballots to avoid using the computers. Paul Hultin, an attorney seeking to bar the use of the systems, said the November election is "headed for a train wreck." Full Story | CO news page

California

California Voters Statement on Court Ruling in Continuing Suit to Block State’s Use of Diebold Touch Screen Electronic Voting Systems
For Immediate Release:  San Francisco, CA, September 14, 2006
A group of California voters, including civil rights leader Dolores Huerta and several disabled persons, vowed to continue its lawsuit, filed on March 21, 2006, to block the State’s use of Diebold TSx DRE touch screen electronic voting systems, while expressing disappointment over today’s ruling by the California Superior Court in San Francisco, that permits the machines to be used in this November’s elections. 
Full Release
| CA news page

Alameda County, CA Letter re: Security Test of Sequoia Voting Machines
Full Letter
| CA legal page

Holder vs. McPherson
Petitioner’s Reply for the Memorandum of Points and Authorities for a Writ of Mandate and Preliminary Injunction
Full Memo | CA legal page

Wisconsin

Officials to recount Milwaukee ballots
By Dave Umhoefer and Derrick Nunnally | Milwaukee Journal Sentinel | September 14, 2006
Every ballot bag from every ward in the city of Milwaukee will be reopened for a manual recount of the number of votes cast in Tuesday's primary election, city and county officials announced this morning. The new count is restricted to the total number of votes cast in the election and won't recount the votes for any individual candidates. It begins at 1 p.m. today at the city's warehouse at 1028 N. Hawley Road and is open to the public. Full Story | WI news page

 

 

Click the color shaded states to see current “Voter Actions” and other active litigation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voter Action is a project of The International Humanities Center, a 501c3 organization.

© 2006 Voter Action

DesignXmjp

 


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Judge: Electronic Voting Allowed In Nov. Election  http://cbs4denver.com/local/local_story_265222944.html

Election Officials: Paper Would Be 'Pretty Risky' http://cbs4denver.com/local/local_story_265101250.html

Judge Refuses To Put Dennis On Stand In Voter Suit  http://cbs4denver.com/local/local_story_264130052.html

Expert Faults Voting Machines Approved For State  http://cbs4denver.com/local/local_story_264095210.html

Lawyers Blast Electronic Voting Systems  http://cbs4denver.com/local/local_story_263093843.html

 

 

 


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/politics/9910791/detail.html#

TheDenverChannel.com

Related To Story

·                          Video: Judge Allows Voting Machines But Criticizes Secretary Of State


Judge Won't Bar Use Of Electronic Voting Machines

Voters' Lawsuit Claims Machines Can Be Easily Manipulated

POSTED: 9:37 am MDT September 22, 2006

UPDATED: 6:43 pm MDT September 22, 2006

DENVER -- A judge cleared the way Friday for electronic voting machines to be used in the November election, though he chastised state officials for botching some of the steps that needed to be taken to make sure the devices can't be tampered with.

Denver District Judge Lawrence Manzanares said the secretary of state's office had violated state law by failing to come up with minimum security standards for the machines, many of which will be used in Colorado's most populous counties. He said the office had done an "abysmal" job in testing the machines.

However, Manzanares said he would not bar the use of the machines with the election just six weeks away and county clerks warning that they might not be able to print enough paper ballots in time. A lawsuit filed by a handful of voters had claimed the machines were not secure, suggesting the accuracy of election results in jeopardy.

"The risks of decertifying them are greater than the risks of not using them," Manzanares said. He said election workers don't have time to come up with a new plan for voters and overhauling the current system might lead to chaos.

Still, the judge said the secretary of state will have to come up with new security guidelines for the voting machines by the next election, after the upcoming Nov. 7 election.

The lawsuit, filed by 13 voters, sought to have four types of the machines barred from use.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued the machines can be easily manipulated to switch people's votes, that state officials didn't take adequate steps to test or secure the machines, and that the state was under pressure from county clerks to approve the machines quickly. They also argued they are not easily accessible to voters with disabilities and were susceptible to breakdowns.

The judge said Friday that the machines can be used but the counties should beef up security at polling places.

"My reaction to the judge's ruling is I'm disappointed he's going to allow the machines to be used in the election but I'm not at all surprised by that because of the timing of this and the practical considerations. But I think this is a huge win for the voters of Colorado. The judge has said that the most fundamental aspect of the certification of these machines was not complied with. He found that (the secretary of state) didn't do a scientific evaluation of the machines," said Paul Hultin, the attorney for the plaintiffs.

Lawyers for the secretary of state's office said the machines have been approved by independent laboratories endorsed by the government and were reviewed according to state law. They also said the machines will print receipt-like paper ballots that can be used in case of a recount or audit.

"The judge focused on the testing requirements and I think we can try to do a better job on some of the standards that we've adopted. So that's what we're going to be looking at right now. We wanted to do that anyway," said Bill Hobbs, deputy secretary of state.

Manzanares said that just because secretary of state didn't set minimum standards for testing doesn't mean that the machines are vulnerable electoral fraud.

"Colorado voters should not be concerned about the security of the November election," said Secretary of State Gigi Dennis in a public release. "We are fortunate to have a team of county clerks who take their job of providing fair, open, and secure elections very seriously. We are pleased the judge recognized the need to keep this year's election moving forward and we will work toward improving our rules and standards in this area."

Six large counties plan to use only the electronic voting machines in November: Arapahoe, Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, Mesa and Weld. The machines were used in many of these counties during the August primary.

Previous Stories:

 

Copyright 2006 by TheDenverChannel.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Title: 9news.com
 


Judge refuses to bar electronic voting machines
posted by:  Dan Boniface  Web Producer
Created:  - Updated:

DENVER (AP) - A judge cleared the way Friday for electronic voting machines to be used in the November election, though he chastised state officials.

Denver District Judge Lawrence Manzanares reprimanded officials for botching some of the steps that needed to be taken to make sure the devices can't be tampered with.

Manzanares said the secretary of state's office had violated state law by failing to come up with minimum security standards for the machines, many of which will be used in Colorado's most populous counties. He said the office had done an "abysmal" job in testing the machines.

However, the judge said he would not bar the use of the machines with the election just six weeks away and county clerks warning that they might not be able to print enough paper ballots in time. A lawsuit filed by a handful of voters had claimed the machines were not secure, suggesting the accuracy of election results were in jeopardy.

"The risks of decertifying them are greater than the risks of not using them," the judge said. He said election workers don't have time to come up with a new plan for voters and overhauling the current system might lead to chaos.

Still, the judge said the secretary of state will have to come up with new security guidelines for the voting machines after the Nov. 7 election.

The lawsuit, filed by 13 voters, sought to have four types of the machines barred from use.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued the machines can be easily manipulated to switch people's votes, that state officials didn't take adequate steps to test or secure the machines, and that the state was under pressure from county clerks to approve the machines quickly.

They also argued they are not easily accessible to voters with disabilities.

Lawyers for the secretary of state's office said the machines have been approved by independent laboratories endorsed by the government and were reviewed according to state law. They also said the machines will print receipt-like paper ballots that can be used in case of a recount or audit.

Six large counties plan to use only the electronic voting machines in November: Arapahoe, Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, Mesa and Weld.





(Copyright by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


--- End Message ---