[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FW: PRESS 10062006 Voting machines could be costly for Larimer, Weld



Title: Greeley Tribune - News

Greeley Tribune

Voting machines could be costly for Larimer, Weld

 

 

Brian D. Sabin- Medill News Service
October 6, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Larimer County officials say complying with new election rules designed to keep touch-screen voting machines secure will be so expensive, it could force service cutbacks or layoffs of county employees.

The rules, they say, may cost the county another $600,000 on top of more than $850,000 it already spent on the new voting machines. A study by Election Data Services shows that Larimer, Weld and more than 500 other counties nationwide purchased new touch-screens since the last presidential election to meet a federal funding deadline set by the Help America Vote Act.

In Weld, the new rules could cost between $20,000 and $108,000, Weld Clerk and Recorder Steve Moreno estimated.

Larimer Clerk and Recorder Scott Doyle said the state's new rules were unnecessary and confusing.

"I think we're in real trouble, to be honest with you," he said. "The new procedures are going to be extremely difficult to meet, if we can meet them at all."

The requirements were issued late last month by Colorado's Secretary of State Gigi Dennis in response to a Sept. 22 ruling from a Denver district court judge who found that the state had done an "abysmal" job of testing its new touch-screen machines.

A group of 13 voters brought the lawsuit to ban the computer voting machines, which are used by every county in Colorado, saying the touch-screen systems were at risk for tampering.

Judge Lawrence Manzanares ordered state officials to write detailed rules so that counties could make sure no one tampers with the machines.

Dennis responded with an 11-page set of security procedures for using the touch-screen machines. They include specific requirements for temperature and humidity in the rooms where voting equipment is stored and continuous video surveillance of polling places, storage spaces and rooms where ballots are counted. The new rules also demand additional tamper-proof seals and require that delivery workers who move the machines be followed by county workers in a "chase vehicle."

The new requirements are "a huge expense we weren't planning on," Larimer County Manager Frank Lancaster said. "Frankly, I think some of the requirements are a little ridiculous. At this point we'll have more security on unused voting machines than on evidence in a murder trial."

New video surveillance requirements alone could cost Larimer between $200,000 and $300,000, according to Sheriff Department Lt. Steven Bebell, who oversees the security systems in county buildings. The state's regulations require that all areas where election software is used be continuously recorded for 90 days before the election and at least 30 days after.

Both Larimer and Weld counties use motion-activated cameras to monitor their election sites. Officials from both counties said those cameras will be upgraded and additional ones will be added to meet the new requirements.

Counties must then store all of the footage for 25 months. Storing 120 days worth of round-the-clock digital surveillance video requires a huge amount of computer memory. Bebell estimates that he would need 37 terabytes, more than all of the county's computer systems combined, to store all of that video for more than two years. He said the requirement is unreasonable. "Even Las Vegas doesn't hold on to their recordings for that long," Bebell said.

Larimer County's Doyle said the total cost of the new surveillance, tamper-proof seals, equipment storage, and extra manpower could be as high as $600,000.


Attachment: ATT00115.dat
Description: Binary data