[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Eagleton Report on Provisional Voting
To
: "CFVI Attendees" <
attendees@xxxxxxx
>, "Harvie - CFVI" <
harvie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>, "David Larson" <
d.larson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>, "
Tmmco1@xxxxxxx
" <
Tmmco1@xxxxxxx
>, "Cary Lacklen" <
cclacklen@xxxxxxxxx
>, "Citizens for Verifiable Voting" <
cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Eagleton Report on Provisional Voting
From
: "Margit Johansson" <
margitjo@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 01:21:26 -0700
Delivered-to
: mailing list
cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature
: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=7eZL3pw8nVMWq6/fO9RiKzwVcsYHi3HBICZ9tGu+w70=; b=kphbfgMdD2fRWfCs2DXdBXZsL+t6bfJRvGN0qGOFD7EK1jUgnc6wt/RqgC2SRp3DFz3taGv9edZIJnF0gtQ5j0lDW2ZWRzvZ4ssnp8zYRoa9BDNVcg1LdNmwPZpBaM3ZR+wdz7TdPfX3MzBNzM96LiklUVjkvFMXyimv+hufcQQ=
Domainkey-signature
: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=duF/f2iRg27GpL5lK7VWy3uhafRqep/m/bTUylKYot18nXhwRC8ScAYeKmk6hXQrapWhzhQLs23juSiHpMFi4DPDZs7piwfazohzvt1zaizOAXgFUY+omxF08KaToGnlbiwm29qZhzokk9WGgwP0xHnjrZZrGQi1A9E7wqcIIrs=
List-help
: <
mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net
>
List-post
: <
mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net
>
Mailing-list
: contact
cvv-discuss-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
; run by ezmlm
Another study the EAC seems not to have released:
Rick Hasen has posted this on his Election Law Blog
<
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/009837.html
>
Eagleton Report on Provisional Voting
<
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/provisional-report.pdf
>
Appendix A <
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/provisional-a.pdf
>
Appendix B <
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/provisional-b.pdf
>
Appendix C <
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/provisional-c.pdf
>
Appendix D <
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/provisional-d.pdf
>
Appendix E <
http://electionlawblog.org/archives/provisional-e.pdf
>
Appendix F, 491 pages of state statutes, is too large for Rick to post.
Prev by Date:
check out NOW program on elections, on PBS
Next by Date:
Fwd: Diebold Tabulation Software Goes on Trial in Pima County, Arizona
Previous by thread:
check out NOW program on elections, on PBS
Next by thread:
Fwd: Diebold Tabulation Software Goes on Trial in Pima County, Arizona
Index(es):
Date
Thread