[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pew stinks
- To: "Margit Johansson" <margitjo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Pew stinks
- From: Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:21:38 -0600
- Cc: "Paul Walmsley" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "debsueadams@xxxxxxxxxxx" <debsueadams@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Harvie Branscomb" <harvie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Geof Cahoon" <gcahoon@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dave Larson" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "angielayton@xxxxxxxx" <angielayton@xxxxxxxx>, "Ivan C. Meek" <ivan.meek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "joseph richey" <richey80304@xxxxxxxxx>, "CFVI Attendees" <attendees@xxxxxxx>, "Citizens for Verifiable Voting" <cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Al Kolwicz" <alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivered-to: mailing list cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <bfc40aa0807091004v7aea8b91v622a2cbba13eca87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-help: <mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net>
- List-post: <mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net>
- Mailing-list: contact cvv-discuss-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <bfc40aa0807091004v7aea8b91v622a2cbba13eca87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: ralphs@xxxxxxxxx
OH MY GOD!
WHAT IS WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE!?!?!
Can anyone suggest a way to fight this? Ask pew to fund counter-research?
Anybody have any ideas how to do this?
Ralph Shnelvar
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:04:37 -0600, you wrote:
>Look at what they are funding!! (Somebody should apply, and come up with
>honest findings.)
>Margit
>
>Margit Johansson
>303-442-1668/ margitjo@xxxxxxxxx
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: Pew's Make Voting Work Announces New Funding Available
>Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:47:07 -0400
>From: Zachary Markovits <ZMarkovits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Zachary Markovits <ZMarkovits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>CC: Carolynn Race <CRace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Caudell-Feagan
><MCaudell-Feagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>I am writing to alert you of a new opportunity for funding available
>through Pew's Make Voting Work (MVW) initiative. MVW, a project of
>the Pew Center on the States in partnership with the JEHT Foundation,
>has announced up to $400,000 in new funding available for research
>examining alternatives to precinct-based election day voting,
>including early in-person and absentee voting and vote by mail
>systems.
>
>Interested applicants can apply for funds through a request for
>proposals (RFP), which is attached or available here at our website.
>The RFP is part of Pew's Make Voting Work initiative, which is focused
>on improving the accuracy, convenience, efficiency and security of
>U.S. elections. Proposals will be accepted through August 15, 2008.
>MVW is issuing a Request for Proposals to advance research in this
>area and as a complement to the broader Make Voting Work research
>agenda.
>
>Proposals are encouraged from an array of organizations, individuals
>and teams, but preference will be shown to partnerships between
>election officials and academic researchers. If you have questions
>about the RFP, do not hesitate to contact me.
>
>All the best,
>
>Zachary Markovits
>
>Zachary S. Markovits
>
>Associate, Make Voting Work
>
>Pew Center on the States
>
>The Pew Charitable Trusts
>
>1025 F Street NW |Suite 900 |
>
>Washington, DC 20004
>
>p: 202.552.2157 | f: 202.552.2299 | e: zmarkovits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>www.pewtrusts.org