[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Partial success in making HB11-1219 better



Congratulations on getting the one amendment incorporated, you guys.  That will make a difference.

Sunny

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Margit Johansson <margitjo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Hi All,
 
Thanks to those of you who contacted your state Senator about Coloradans for Voting Integrity’s two amendments related to HB11-1219 (UMOVA). 

Last Friday, that bill, the Colorado version of "Uniform Bill UMOVA" (related to military and overseas civilian voting), passed on 3rd reading, with only one of the two amendments we proposed incorporated.
 
CFVI’s Amendment #2 (defining which voters are covered by the bill) was included, so in the end, the “covered voters” included military personnel who are "absent" from their home state, but not ALL military. So that was a positive.
  
The Senate failed, however, to rule out electronic transmission of voted ballots, as CFVI proposed in our Amendment #1. 

Our present law on this matter allows return of voted ballots by overseas military via fax, or electronic mail "in circumstances where another more secure voting method is not available or feasible."  [See CRS 2010.1-8-103.5(2)(a), (4)] 

HB11-1219, however, extends the limited use of this procedure to all out-of-state active military and all possible categories of overseas civilians. Our concerns that such an exception would not be administered as intended were ignored. Who determines that no more secure method is available, and what will "feasible" be interpreted to mean? 
 
So, our Amendment #1 was ignored, despite evidence of widespread efforts (as in the national MOVE Act) to
·       lengthen the timeline for the election process and
·       allow electronic transmission of blank ballots and other voting materials.
These changes have been made partly so that electronic transmission of voted ballots could be avoided, because such a procedure is so insecure. Non-electronic means such as mail or FedEx are available as alternatives.
 
The misinformation campaigns of vendors and the DOD prevailed in Colorado; the solid information of the computer security scientists did not.  Voters lost.

But we are not giving up, to carelessly hand over our elections to self-serving parties!
 
In 2009, our legislature passed a law allowing our Colorado 2012 elections to include a DOD-run pilot project on Internet voting.  Despite the insecurity of the Internet for voting, the pilot project will be run in our ACTUAL election, not in a mock one! The law requires measures which cannot be fulfilled.  (See CRS 2010. 1-5.5-101.)  

Any good ideas on how to deal with this misguided legislation are welcomed!
 
Best Wishes,
Margit
 
Margit Johansson
Coloradans for Voting Integrity (CFVI)
303-442-1668