Citizens for Verifiable Voting   Mar25WorkSession UserPreferences
 
HelpContents Search Diffs Info Edit Subscribe XML Print View

March 25th, 2005 ERC Work Session

Return to ERC Agendas and Minutes

The committee simply brainstormed out a list based on information gathered during meetings. This list will be the basis for the committee's final report.

1. Hart System As 24-28 hour “bestcase.”

2. H.R. Staffing / Training

3. Processes: Standard vs Anomaly.

4. Ballot Filtering Dealing w/ Overvotes

5. System didn’t resolve over-Votes

6. Ballot Printing Anomaly

7. Space

8. Hart – Lack of Running Tally.

9. Backup Management Plant

10. Efficient Logic 7 Accuracy Test

11. Lack of Good Contract

12. Processing Time of Provisional Ballots

13. Mail & Absentee Ballot Verification – Validation Process

14. Ballot Procurement & Quality Control.

15. Inadequate Voter Education

16. hart Software Not Robust

17. Procedural Testing

18. Constantly Changing Rules

19. Training & Qualifications of Election Workers

20. Implementing HAVA

21. Lack of Scanning/ Resolution at Precinct Level

22. Recruitment of temps

23. Need More progress reports to Media

24. WRITE-IN Auto Count

25. Lack of Knowledge of Proprietary Software

26. 11 x 17 Ballot Size

27. Software is not Adaptable

28. Court Cases

29. Systems inability to run ballots through. Scanner out of order.

30. Polling Location having 2 voter lists

31. Resolution teams unbalanced between Parties

32. Ballot Marking Device

33. Lack of hart Specifications & Information

34. 100% of Ballots were resolved during the counting process.

1. Signature Verification

2. Voter Responsibility to express their intent according to rules.

3. 227 Precincts Create Logistical Burden

4. Inadequate Polling Booths: Both Number and Privacy.

5. Partisan Voting Process issues

6. Confidence & Transparency at Precinct Level.

7. Lack of vote posting at each precinct. Polling location

8. Open Source Code on Public Domain.

9. Voter Education

10. Voter Registration Process.

11. Defacing of Ballot by Voter.

12. Ineffectual Integration

13. Watcher & Electioneering Control at Polling Locations

14. Successful Polling location Selection should be: Accessible, Secure & Properly Run.

15. Lack of an Integrated Quality Management System.

16. Major changes before Presidential Election.

Return to ERC Agendas and Minutes


PythonPowered
EditText of this page (last modified 2005-03-29 16:50:45)
FindPage by browsing, title search , text search or an index
Or try one of these actions: LikePages, LocalSiteMap, SpellCheck