[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Comment regarding Election Equipment Purchase



Mr. Halicki,

 

Thank you for publishing the proposed voting system contract on the website.

 

Based on what is published, we cannot discern if the 13 requirements outlined in our letter of April 9 (pasted below) will be met by the proposed system. 

 

If all 13 requirements will not be satisfied, we ask that you revise the agreement to incorporate everything needed to ensure that the election will be trustworthy.

 

We believe that it will not go over well with the people to learn that additional money will be needed for the 2004 elections.

 

We are particularly concerned that the planned testing and certification are inadequate.

 

 

 

Al Kolwicz

Executive Director

 

CAMBER

Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx

www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz

 

 

 

 


From: alkolwicz [mailto:alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:16 AM
To: Tom Halicki (thalicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Cc: Linda Salas (lsalas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); Paul Danish
Subject: RE: Request for review of Trustworthy Elections Requirements

 

Tom,

 

Just a note to verify that you received this.

 

Al

 

 

 

CAMBER

Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx

www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz


From: alkolwicz [mailto:alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:39 PM
To: Tom Halicki (thalicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Cc: Linda Salas (lsalas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); Paul Danish
Subject: FW: Request for review of Trustworthy Elections Requirements

 

Tom,

 

Just checking to see if you are planning to respond to our request of April 9 (below). 

 

As you know, we plan to go public with this on the 15th, and hope to in corporate your corrections and endorsement.

 

Al

 

 

 

CAMBER

Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx

www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz


From: alkolwicz [mailto:alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 3:09 PM
To: Tom Halicki (thalicki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Cc: Linda Salas (lsalas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); Paul Danish; Citizens for Verifiable Voting (cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx); CAMBER ; Bob Mcgrath (bob.mcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx); Carol Mehesy (cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx); Donna Plutschuck (donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx); Monty Lambie (mlambie@xxxxxxxxx); Pete Klammer (PKlammer@xxxxxxx); Peter Raich (peter.raich@xxxxxxxx); Tracy Abell (TresCeeA@xxxxxxx)
Subject: Request for review of Trustworthy Elections Requirements

 

Tom,

 

Pasted below is a letter and draft requirements for the 2004 elections. 

 

I have sent the document by fax to you, Linda, and Larry Hoyt.

 

Al Kolwicz

 

CAMBER

Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx

www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz

 

 

 

 

 

DATE:            April 9, 2004

 

TO:      Tom Halicki, County Elections Manager

 

CC:     Linda Salas, County Clerk
Larry Hoyt, County Attorney
Paul Danish, County Commission

Citizens for Verifiable Voting

            Coloradoans for Voting Integrity

 

SUB:   Requirements for Trustworthy Elections – 2004 Primary and General

 

 

In the interest of Trustworthy Elections we propose that the following requirements be adopted by the County for the 2004 Primary and General elections.  

 

As you will see, some of these requirements are more precise and in some cases more strict than the minimum standards established by statute and election rules.  These enhancements are needed to ensure a trustworthy election. 

 

We have listed the requirements, our understanding of current statutes and rules governing each, and our understanding of what authority may legally adopt each requirement.

 

We ask you to analyze these requirements, rules, and authorities, and let us know any changes that you would recommend. 

 

We plan to release them to the public no later than April 15, 2004 and want the published version to be accurate and to include your endorsement or specific exceptions.

 

Thank you in advance for your prompt reply.

 

Yours in support of trustworthy elections,

 

 

Al Kolwicz, Executive Director

Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx

www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz

 


Requirements for Trustworthy Elections – 2004 Primary and General

 

 

A.                 REQUIREMENTS for the 2004 Primary and General Elections

 

1.                  The accuracy of each process and team and individual must be measured before it is used in production.  The accuracy of each must be sampled during and after the election.  These measurements must be made public on the Internet within two hours of their determination

2.                  Procedures for precinct and central poll watching must be developed to give watchers the ability to actually read the information that is being processed, a procedure for reporting problems, a procedure for resolving problem reports in a timely manner, and no charge and timely access to needed records including computer files.

3.                  Records such as registration lists and in-person and absentee poll books must be maintained in a form that is open to viewing by poll watchers throughout the election cycle.   The official voter registration list must be the one used on Election Day.

4.                  All votes must be recorded on preprinted paper ballots that contain a removable ballot stub.

5.                  Every voter must have the opportunity to verify the marks on their ballot and to either obtain a replacement ballot or deposit their anonymous ballot into a secure ballot box.

6.                  A ballot voted in person must take precedence over an absentee ballot for the same voter.  (This requires that absentee ballot return envelopes not be opened before early, precinct and provisional voting has completed.)

7.                  Rules for absentee ballot qualification must be documented, approved by the political parties, uniformly and strictly interpreted, and the qualification of voters and absentee ballots must done in a transparent fashion and open to oversight.  The measurement requirements in #1 above must be met.

8.                  The ballots to be interpreted and counted are the paper ballots that were verified and cast by the voters.  Ballots must not be interpreted or counted before Election Day

9.                  Rules for interpretation of a vote must be documented, approved by the political parties, uniformly and strictly interpreted, and the interpretation of votes must be done in a transparent fashion and open to oversight and must be verifiable down to a 50 ballot batch.  The measurement requirements in #1 above must be met.

10.             Rules for counting the interpreted votes be documented, approved by the political parties, uniformly and strictly interpreted, and the counting of votes must be done in a transparent fashion and open to oversight and must be verifiable down to a 50 ballot batch.  The measurement requirements in #1 above must be met.


 

11.             Rules for conducting a recount must be documented, approved by the political parties, uniformly and strictly interpreted, and the recount must be done in a transparent fashion and open to oversight and must be verifiable down to a 50 ballot batch.  The recount must begin with the original ballots cast by the voters (this means that the votes must be re-interpreted).  The recount personnel and systems must have no detail knowledge from a prior count/recount.  The measurement requirements in #1 above must be met.  

12.             Rules for verifying the accuracy of the election must be documented including formulae for auditing ballots, voters, votes, problem reports, and the precision of the election.

13.             Before declaring final election results, measurement statistics must be made public.

 

B.                 STUATUTES & RULES that prohibit us from achieving the requirements

 

1.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

2.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

3.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

4.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

5.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

6.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

7.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

8.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

9.                  Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

10.             Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

11.             Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

12.             Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

13.             Nothing in the current law or rules is known to prohibit this

 

C.                AUTHORITY that can make the decision to achieve the requirement

 

1.                  Local Election Official

2.                  Local Election Official

3.                  Local Election Official

4.                  Local Election Official

5.                  Local Election Official

6.                  Local Election Official

7.                  Local Election Official

8.                  Local Election Official

9.                  Local Election Official

10.             Local Election Official

11.             Local Election Official

12.             Local Election Official

13.              Local Election Official