Re: Truth vs. Colorado Secretary of State (voter verifiable not certified?)

[Barbara Simons <simons@xxxxxxx>]

This incorrect claim also appeared in the California ACLU's recent report.
I wonder who is providing this "misinformation", aka lies.  Barbara

On 4/29/04 3:46 PM, "David B. Aragon" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The Avante VoteTrakker model 4.4.3 has NASED #03120000443-1990.
> 
> Two Avante products are listed on the Election Center's page at
> http://www.electioncenter.org/about/nased3.htm
> 
> The California Ad Hoc Touch Screen Task Force report said that there
> was, at the time of that report, at least one certified system.  This
> is such a widely known report that it is hard to imagine a state
> elections official saying the actual number was zero.
> 
> Additionally it could be noted that a Vogue (now Sequoia) AutoMark
> ballot printer together with a scanner would provide both an
> accessible interface and a paper ballot, although not certified
> as "a DRE with a voter-verified audit trail".
> 
> There may be others.  One, however, is enough to refute the often-
> repeated (and often corrected, but then repeated again) claim that
> there are none.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dave Aragon.
> -----------------------
> Chair, Voter Registration Committee, Voter March Ltd.
> Co-Chair, IEEE P1583 Special Task Group on Voter Verified Paper Ballots