Re: FW: Public interest protection

[Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Al:

It's enough to make people put on military fatigues and run to the hills.

Really, very disheartening.

Ralph


On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 20:55:58 -0600, you wrote:

>You all might want to read this sequence -- bottom up.
>
>Al
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: alkolwicz [mailto:alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 7:19 AM
>To: 'Office of the Attorney General'
>Subject: RE: Public interest protection
>
>Too bad.
>
>Again, thank you very much for your prompt advice.
>
>Al
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Office of the Attorney General [mailto:attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 7:16 AM
>To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: Public interest protection
>
>No
>
>
>
>>>> "alkolwicz" <alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx> 4/29/2004 7:58:21 AM >>>
>I have done so, and will continue to do so.
>
>Is there no way to require the SOS office to cease and desist?
>
>Al
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Office of the Attorney General
>[mailto:attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 6:55 AM
>To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx 
>Subject: RE: Public interest protection
>
>Again, if you believe the Secretary of State is providing erroneous
>information to legislators, then it is your right to contact legislators to
>rebut the information.
>
>
>
>
>>>> "alkolwicz" <alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx> 4/29/2004 7:51:21 AM >>>
>Thank you for your prompt consideration.
>
>As you see, the conflict is with the Secretary of State, and I have met with
>the Secretary of State and they refuse to correct this false information
>using arguments that are outlandish.
>
>There must be a way to get third party help in a situation like this.
>
>We've got the accused serving as judge.
>
>Al
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Office of the Attorney General
>[mailto:attorney.general@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 6:39 AM
>To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx 
>Subject: Re: Public interest protection
>
>If you believe there has been an error, we suggest you contact the Secretary
>of State's office with your information.  Otherwise, you have the right to
>contact legislators to correct what you believe to be erroneous information.
>
>
>
>
>>>> "alkolwicz" <alkolwicz@xxxxxxxxx> 4/28/2004 6:48:41 PM >>>
>Attorney General Salazar,
>
>The Secretary of State's office has provided what we believe to be
>inaccurate testimony to the Colorado legislature on a bill that was created
>by the SOS's office - HB04-1227.
>
>At least one Senator, on 3/4 vote said, before voting, that he voted against
>a strengthening amendment because of the SOS testimony.
>
>We believe that the SOS should have known the accurate facts or at least
>explained that there were differences of opinion.
>
>Is there any provision in the law to protect the public from public
>officials' providing legislators with inaccurate data when lobbying for
>their own bill?
>
>The bill is due for 3rd hearing in the Senate. 
>
>Thank you for your prompt consideration.
>
> 
>Al Kolwicz
>Executive Director
>CAMBER
>Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results
>2867 Tincup Circle
>Boulder, CO 80305
>303-494-1540
>AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx 
>www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz 
>http://coloradovoter.blogspot.com 
> 
>
>
>
>