[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [stopvotefraud] Re: [VerifiedVoting.org lobbyists] Ensign Bill S2437



Mark,

 

I ask you to please reflect once again on what you have written, and what I have written.

 

I think you may be missing the point, which may be due to my ineffective articulation of it.

 

Perhaps you’d like to walk me through which problems you think that the proposed audit trail would solve and how the audit trail would accomplish this.

 

Cheers

 

al

 

 

 


From: Mark Gubrud [mailto:mgubrud@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:48 PM
To: AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Andrew G. Silver'; 'Pamela Smith'; lobbyists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stopvotefraud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ncverifiablevoting@xxxxxxxxx; Citizens for Verifiable Voting; Dr. Charles Corry; Sheila Horton; Pete Klammer; Bob Mcgrath; Carol Mehesy; Donna Plutschuck; Monty Lambie; Peter Raich; Tracy Abell
Subject: Re: [stopvotefraud] Re: [VerifiedVoting.org lobbyists] Ensign Bill S2437

 

Your essential claim is that the ballot receipts would be

> printed in a form that is excessively
> difficult for voters to verify and costly for
> officials to use for independent counting

If this is true, it constitutes the substance of your argument.
However, you do not provide any evidence to support this claim.

The fact that the receipts would rarely be counted is not very
relevant to their function as a deterrent to vote-rigging, or
as an incentive to contractors and officials to ensure security.



alkolwicz wrote:
>
> The "audit trail" bills are intended to deceive voters into believing that
> they are verifying the votes that will decide an election.  This is not what
> these bills do.
>
>
>
> Instead, voters would be verifying a secondary document that: (1) does not
> necessarily reflect the voter's choices, (2) is printed in a form that is
> excessively difficult for voters to verify and costly for officials to use
> for independent counting and (3) is not the official ballot and will rarely
> be counted.
>
>
>
> The fundamental requirement is this: each voter must be able to verify that
> their real votes that will be used to determine the election outcome are
> recorded as the voter intends and must be able to obtain a replacement
> ballot if they are not.  (There are additional requirements such as:
> recorded votes must be permanent, every ballot must be secure and accounted
> for, and the interpretation of votes must be unambiguous, but these
> requirements are not documented here.)
>
>
>
> We continue to ask for the following:
>
>
>
> Trustworthy Elections Resolution
>
>
>
> WHEREAS trustworthy elections are basic to democracy,
>
>
>
> WHEREAS trustworthy elections require that each vote is anonymous, secure,
> verified by the voter and counted as intended by the voter,
>
>
>
> WHEREAS paperless voting machines make it impossible for us to verify that
> our votes are correctly recorded,
>
>
>
> WHEREAS paperless voting machines make it impossible to prove that each vote
> is correctly counted,
>
>
>
> WHEREAS a receipt printer on a paperless voting machine would not solve
> these problems because the votes printed on the receipt can be different
> from the votes stored in the machine, and because votes on the receipts
> would rarely be counted,
>
>
>
> WHEREAS accurate re-counting requires that the votes on the original paper
> ballots be examined and counted, and that the results from a previous count
> are not known to the people doing the re-counting,
>
>
>
> WHEREAS failure to conduct trustworthy elections opens the door to
> undetectable errors and fraud and destroys voter confidence,
>
>
>
> THEREFORE, we voters want to hand mark or machine mark our votes onto
> full-ballot-text paper ballots, to check our votes before we cast them, to
> know that the votes on our paper ballot are what get counted, and to have
> access to proof that every ballot is accounted for and that every vote is
> correctly understood and counted.
>
>
>
>
>
> Al Kolwicz
>
>
>
> CAMBER
>
> Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results
>
> 2867 Tincup Circle
>
> Boulder, CO 80305
>
> 303-494-1540
>
> AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx
>
> www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz
>
> http://coloradovoter.blogspot.com


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT
click here

 


Yahoo! Groups Links