[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Possible Denver Post Ad



Would be a great way to get more people's attention.  I assume the dates are reversed.  Since people are applying now for absentee ballots, the first add would need to go out NOW.
Unfortunately, the expense is essentially prohibitive to us, unless somebody has some great connections!
Next best, will be to try to get the media to run our PSAs free (once we are incorporated), but the coverage is uncertain (i.e., radio or TV stations running PSAs at 2 AM).
Something the Media Committee could address.

Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Robert Mcgrath [SMTP:mcgrath_mcnally@xxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:01 PM
> To:	dougrcurtis@xxxxxxxxxxx; TresCeeA@xxxxxxx; jcc@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc:	AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx; Edermarth@xxxxxxx; BobRobertPaulson@xxxxxxxxx; laurieannb@xxxxxxx; cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; davide475@xxxxxxxx; SDeLeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cindy@xxxxxxx; ellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; evan@xxxxxxxx; therebis1475@xxxxxxxxxxx; pklammer@xxxxxxx; cary.lacklen@xxxxxxxxxxx; lynnlandes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; michelle.mulder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; charlesmyrta@xxxxxxxx; ralphs@xxxxxxxxx; bthack@xxxxxxxxxxx; summerstorm03@xxxxxxxxxxx; donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx; jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx; mlambie@xxxxxxxxx; Raich, Peter C.
> Subject:	RE: Possible Denver Post Ad
> 
> This is the kind of creative thinking that is helpful for us to consider.  I 
> need to figure out if there is a different paper ballot we can direct people 
> to obtain that would still be able to utilize this ad campaign, or whether 
> we can get some sort of ruling on how to force the counting of absentee 
> ballots so we could go with your first idea here....
> 
> 
> >From: "dougrcurtis" <dougrcurtis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: "dougrcurtis" <dougrcurtis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: "Robert Mcgrath" <mcgrath_mcnally@xxxxxxx>,<TresCeeA@xxxxxxx>
> >CC: 
> ><AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx>,<Edermarth@xxxxxxx>,<BobRobertPaulson@xxxxxxxxx>,<laurieannb@xxxxxxx>,<cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<davide475@xxxxxxxx>,<SDeLeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<cindy@xxxxxxx>,<ellen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<evan@xxxxxxxx>,<jcc@xxxxxxxxx>,<therebis1475@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<pklammer@xxxxxxx>,<cary.lacklen@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<lynnlandes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<michelle.mulder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<charlesmyrta@xxxxxxxx>,<ralphs@xxxxxxxxx>,<bthack@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<summerstorm03@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,<jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx>,<mlambie@xxxxxxxxx>,<peter.raich@xxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Possible Denver Post Ad
> >Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:06:46 -0600
> >
> >Bob and group:
> >After reading your "CFVI Advice to CO Voters" email, I thought that I had
> >come up with a good idea for an ad campaign.  But upon reading the Bev
> >Harris editorial, I'm not so sure. But please read on and give me your
> >opinion.
> >
> >What about this as a way to reach Colorado voters: a quarter page
> >add that would advocate absentee voting, running for two Sundays in the
> >Denver Post. The first add to be put in Sunday September 27th, in order to
> >"wet the whistle" and get readers to talk about it at the water cooler, and
> >the second add to be placed Sunday July 11th, to drive the point home.
> >(The reason for the early ad postings would be to provide voters enough 
> >time
> >to send in their applications and receive their absentee ballots.)
> >
> >I was thinking the ad should be a bit provocative:
> >
> >IT'S NOT WHO VOTES THAT COUNTS. IT'S WHO COUNTS THE VOTES!
> >
> >Are you willing to trust your vote to be counted by handful of 
> >corporations?
> >80% of the electronic voting machines used in this country today have been
> >provided by three manufacturers with strong political agenda's. Electronic
> >voting machines provide no legitimate paper trail and the corporations who
> >produce these machines will not reveal their computer source codes. We must
> >vote with Absentee Ballots to insure that there is a reliable record of our> 
> >vote.Order your application for a Absentee Ballot from your county 
> >elections
> >office today!
> >
> >
> >
> 
>