[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Election in Boulder County nullified on constitutional grounds?



There's nothing about the barcode on the ballot that identifies the voter.

"He then went on with a bunch of irrelevancies."

My 'irrelevancies' point to the issues of voter and ballot fraud. I might
assume from your insistence that ballot not be uniquely identified that you
would like to encourage ballot fraud. The barcode identifies the ballot, not
the voter.

Please describe a method to all that have been addressed here how this
barcode can be used to identify the voter that cast the ballot. Inquiring
minds want to know.

Paul Tiger

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Shnelvar [mailto:ralphs@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 5:11 PM
To: paul.tiger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mcgrath, Bob___PI_Mkt; 'LPBC Chairman'; AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx; Citizens
for Verifiable Voting; Carol Mehesy; Donna Plutschuck; Monty Lambie; Pete
Klammer; Peter Raich; Tracy Abell; Tom Halicki; Nancy Jo Wurl;
board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; chair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; chair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Election in Boulder County nullified on constitutional grounds?

I know that Paul's reputation for accuracy and fact checking speaks for
itself.

Mr. Tiger wrote that "[|>] The bar code on the sides of the ballots identify
the ballot style, not the individual ballot. Ballot style is about what
issues a person can vote on in a particular geographical location. My wife
and I would have the same ballot style in a general election, but different
in a primary. We live in the same house, but we are members of different
parties. I get a Libertarian ballot, she gets a Democratic ballot. If we
were members of the same party the barcodes would be identical."

Mr. Tiger then retracted the statement by claiming that he was misinformed.

PT: "Let me be clear that I was misinformed and now stand corrected: in that
there is a barcode that does track the ballot itself with these new ballots.
And I didn't learn this from this email from Joe."

He then went on with a bunch of irrelevancies.


[|>]