Re: Election in Boulder County nullified on constitutional grounds?

[Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@xxxxxxxxx>]

Paul:

Let's take this offline.  If I'm wrong then I'll apologize.  If you are
wrong then, I hope, you will apologize.

OK?

Ralph


On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:34:30 -0600, you wrote:

>Yes Ralph you do repeat yourself. It must be embarrassing. Perhaps you do it
>just to hear yourself?
>
>I worked as an elections judge for about 12 years in this county. I also
>worked in elections. Perhaps you might recall that I also ran for the clerk?
>s position.
>
>If you are going to keep pointing at the elections laws it might be good to
>learn how to read the CRS. At the bottom of the statute page there are
>annotations. One in particular says:
>L. 2002: (1), (2), (3), and (4) amended and (1.6) and (4.5) added, p. 1630,
>§ 7, effective June 7.
>Which happens to be the last one.
>
>This means that the law changed. I don?t know what it said before, and it
>isn?t really that important to me. It appears to be important to you, so I
>suggest you find out.
>
>I most certainly have been incorrect before, and on this I am not. The
>sequence number, which you are calling a serial number, appeared on the
>ballot. It may have also appeared on the stub, but I know that it was on the
>ballot.
>I believe that the clerks? office still has some of these older style
>ballots on hand, and if you are nice they might let you see one.
>
>Paul Tiger