RE: Improving the LAT (Re: Bad ballot markings)

["Some Guy" <someguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

So who was that on the capitol steps? Looked just like you Joe.

I didn't say it was a bad thing, but I'd have to say that at this point it
is irritating for you to turn on and off being a spokesperson as it pleases
you. CVV is an ad hoc group, however you've been speaking for the group for
some time. I haven't seen you deny that role when it is foisted upon you by
the press.

So which will it be this time? Did you or did you not encourage voters to
vote by absentee or provisional ballots on the steps of the capitol last
month?

And why do you insist on including members of the press in your emails if
you don't want to be the defacto mouthpiece? PJ and Ryan are probably
already subscribed. I know people from the Times-Call and the Daily Camera
who are.
Neal and I are having this little sidebar discussion that suddenly goes
public and you've got newsies cc'd. Maybe you should have bcc'd them.

sg
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pezzillo [mailto:jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 2:07 PM
To: Some Guy
Cc: pshields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ryan Morgan; KGNU news;
cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LPBC Board
Subject: Re: Improving the LAT (Re: Bad ballot markings)


I don't recall CVV having an official stance on that, although many
individual members may have expressed theirs. There was definitely a
great deal of discussion on the two organizations various mailings
lists about what to recommend as the "best" (most reliable for having
your vote counted) method, but I don't recall CVV having any group
consensus effort to state a position.

Joe



On Nov 5, 2004, at 1:25 PM, Some Guy wrote:

> And yet CVV and CFVI encouraged voters to vote by absentee or
> provisional to
> be on a paper ballot.
>
> sg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neal McBurnett [mailto:neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>
> <snip>
>
> DREs are a problem for many Americans.  And in the US I think absentee
> ballots are more dangerous even than DREs.
>
> Neal McBurnett
> [|>] snip
>
>