rocky mountain news on the ballot printing errors

[Neal McBurnett <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/election/article/0,1299,DRMN_36_3315282,00.html

Boulder ballots eyed

Officials, printers examine flaws that slowed vote count

By Berny Morson, Rocky Mountain News
November 9, 2004

BOULDER - A printing error that distorted bar codes on paper ballots
is being blamed for delays that made this one of the last counties in
the nation to report election results.

The county clerk's office and officials at a Denver printing company
are examining flaws in thousands of ballots that slowed the vote count
to a crawl.

County Clerk Linda Salas said Monday the bad ballots were distributed
at random, cropping up in some precincts, but not in others. The exact
number of bad ballots is still unknown, Salas said.

"We want to find out what happened so we know, so that it won't happen
again," Salas said.

The counting of votes cast in the election wasn't completed until late
Friday night, causing what Salas said could be "a huge fortune" in
overtime and other costs.

The delays have sparked angry calls, including some from people who
accused the clerk's office of intentionally delaying results.

"Why would anybody want to go through this intentionally? . . . Nobody
would want to do this so that people would get angry at us," Salas
said.

Scanners rejected ballots with the bad bar codes, requiring election
judges to tally those votes race by race.

Voting equipment was tested before the election. But the printing
error occurred only on actual ballots that went to voters, not the
test ballots, Salas said.

Adding to the delays were attempts to figure out why the scanners were
rejecting some ballots. Technicians from Hart Intercivic, which makes
the scanners, and Kodak, which makes the lenses, examined the machines
before the bar code error - which was not visible to the naked eye -
was caught, Salas said.

Eagle Direct of Denver, the company that printed the ballots, has
contacted Xerox, which made the printers.

"We have a feeling it's mostly the machines," Eagle President Howard
Harris said.

Xerox spokeswoman Kara Choquette said the company believes the bad
ballots were printed by a second contractor that used equipment that
either wasn't made by Xerox or wasn't maintained by Xerox.

Eagle and the county officials couldn't be reached following
Choquette's statement, but earlier in the day they had made no mention
of another printer being involved.

The bill for temporary workers and overtime for regular employees is
still being calculated, but Salas said it will be in the tens of
thousands of dollars.

A decision on whether to seek compensation from Eagle or Xerox will be
made after determining exactly what happened and meeting with the
commissioners and the county attorney, she said.

Harris said calculating how much of the delay was caused by the
printer may be difficult.

He noted that write-in votes also caused the county's scanners to
stop.

A write-in candidate for district attorney received more than 8,000
votes.

Boulder residents cast their votes on paper ballots, which were then
tallied by the scanners. That system was selected last spring by the
county commissioners amid concern from some residents that a purely
electronic system would be subject to tampering.

Salas predicted counting would be slow, but projected results by the
next day.

Salas said she would have hit that target if it weren't for the
printing errors.

Al Kolwicz, a Boulder computer worker who has been critical of the
clerk's office, said Monday he might have found the problem if he had
been allowed to test ballots at random as he requested.

But Salas said that would have entailed pulling actual ballots
intended for voters, rather than test ballots. No one was allowed to
see those ballots before the vote, she said.

Counting votes in Boulder County

154,000 votes cast

87.4% voter turnout

100 people worked three days

morsonb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or 303-442-8729

Copyright 2004, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights Reserved.