Rocky Mountain News |
|
To
print this page, select File then Print from your
browser |
URL:
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/election/article/0,1299,DRMN_36_3317633,00.html | Printer played role in Boulder voting woes
By Berny Morson, Rocky Mountain
News November 10, 2004
BOULDER - The head of a Denver company that
printed ballots for Boulder County's troubled election acknowledged
Tuesday he used a subcontractor who might have been responsible for the
problems.
Howard Harris, president of Eagle Direct, declined to name the
subcontractor, saying his company is ultimately responsible for the
work.
Harris did not rule out the
possibility that his own printers might be at fault.
Boulder County Clerk Linda Salas said she wasn't aware Eagle Direct had
subcontracted out some of the $143,000 job.
Boulder officials say bar codes on several thousand ballots were the
wrong size. Scanners would not count the ballots, requiring election
workers to do the tally, race by race.
The vote count took three days, making Boulder one of the last counties
in the nation to report results and running up what Salas called a "huge
fortune" in overtime and other costs.
A spokeswoman for Xerox, which manufactured and maintains Eagle's
printers, said the mistake wasn't caused by their machines.
Kara Choquette said Xerox believes the error was made by the
subcontractor, which uses different equipment.
Harris said the subcontractor uses machines manufactured by a unit of
Kodak.
Whether the bad ballots were printed by Eagle or the subcontractor
won't be known until they can be examined when the vote totals are
certified next week.
Harris also said his company isn't solely to blame for the massive
vote-counting delays.
"We are a part of the problem, and I am not saying we are not, but I
cannot say we are the only problem and all of the problem," he said.
Harris said delays were also caused by write-in votes, which must be
tallied by hand. Jason Savela received more than 8,000 write-in votes in
his failed race against District Attorney Mary Keenan.
"That slowed the process down as much as if the ballots were bad,"
Harris said.
The programming of the scanners might also be to blame for not letting
machines read bar codes that were off by an amount so tiny that it was not
visible to the naked eye, Harris said.
Some of the scanners were not functioning during part of the count,
Harris said.
"We haven't laid everything at (Eagle Direct's) feet. We said we're
looking into it," Salas said.
But, Salas said, the scanners were not the problem. They were down only
while technicians were trying to figure out why some ballots were being
rejected - a search that ended when the printing problem was
identified.
Salas said Hart InterCivic, which manufactured the voting system, was
involved in the trouble-shooting and ruled out a programming error.
Copyright 2004, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights
Reserved. |