|
So after that rather bizarre digression, can we come
back to this? I think we only had four people say yes to hand
counts. I guess everyone else is more interested in fast and secret than
accurate. If we did agree that accurate was more important. I
think that we might want to present a hand counting methodology to the
commissioners and clerk that was actually workable, rather than gestalt
tallies. Is there anyone here that cares about that? About
accurate elections? Or shall we turn this discussion group into something else? Some guy -----Original
Message----- My guess is that
this was a vote by Kell for handcounting. Or is it arguementative? I personally cannot support a computer tally at this
point in time. But I was just asking if list members supported hand counts or computer
counts. It was a simple question. [|>] |