I guess you are implying that is what this is.
I have an activist friend in Ohio and I will ask what he thinks this means,
but I doubt that it means votes vs voters.
About 18 months ago or so, the president of Diebold promised Bush the
election in Ohio. I don't recall the exact quote, but it was big news.
Someone else here probably recalls.
paul - we're in the minority, in that we used paper ballots. Most places
used some kind of electronic thing, and there are no standards for those;
everyone is different; and many that failed to work during the primary were
used again with the same software this time as last.
Our problems are small and solvable, because we have the ballots. Imagine
working on an election where a glitch or just bad code ate the election. No
ballots - poof - all gone.
p
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E Condon [mailto:pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 12:17 PM
To: cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: In Ohio they say - Diebold can do it
Some people chose to use a peculiar definition of "number of votes cast".
To them, a single voter who votes on a single ballot for both a presidential
candidate and a congressional representative, has cast two votes, i.e.
one person, two votes.
In past elections, where election officials were embarrassed by low voter
turn out, they used this way of counting to hide the ugly truth. Maybe the
practice should be stopped.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:49:12AM -0700, Paul Tiger - LPBC - Outreach
wrote:
93,136 EXTRA Votes Found In ONE Ohio County
http://rense.com/general59/one.htm
--
Paul E Condon
pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx