RE: Fw: 100,000 Strong

["Paul Tiger - LPBC - Outreach" <LPBC-O@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nice! Then opposed it. or boycott that race by overvoting it. vote for and
against in just that issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E Condon [mailto:pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:43 AM
To: cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fw: 100,000 Strong

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 08:41:05AM -0700, Michael Melio wrote:
> I'm sure each of us will find something that we can object
> to in the bill.
>
>
>
> But it is a step in the right direction, even if it is a
> small step.
>

As with almost everything in politics, the devil is in the details.
Which of the provisions of the bill(s) are core to her position and
which are 'harmless fluff' that is intended to pacify someone?  I do
not have much confidence in Clinton's ability to draft good
legistration. Mostly I see an aggregation of muddled clauses. If this
becomes law there will be a worse mess than now, mostly because of
little details like a missing word, 'November' in another ballot
issue.

>
>
> We have to crawl before we can walk.

We have been crawling quite nicely for two centuries here in US, and
for longer than that in some countries in Europe. Maybe, for voting,
crawling is the way to go, i.e. hand counted paper ballots.

There is no Constitutional Mandate to provide profits for DRE vendors.


--
Paul E Condon
pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 02/14/2005