[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ERC RFP Response HAVA detail follow-up
I sent the following to the RFP responding members of the ERC whose e-
mail addresses I spared here. -Joe
----------
Greetings!
Thank you for your detailed and strongly worded response to the
Clerk's office regarding the unwise proposed purchase of DREs.
One important detail I wanted to make sure that you were aware of is
that HAVA _does not_ require that a machine be used to provide over-
and undervote prevention. You may have been misled to believe this
was the case.
Here's a link to the full text of the law, and then an excerpt of the
relevant section.
http://www.fec.gov/hava/law_ext.txt
TITLE III--Subtitle A--SEC. 301.
(B) A State or jurisdiction that uses a paper ballot
voting system, a punch card voting system, or a central
count voting system (including mail-in absentee ballots
and mail-in ballots), may meet the requirements of
subparagraph (A)(iii) by--
[[Page 116 STAT. 1705]]
(i) establishing a voter education program
specific to that voting system that notifies each
voter of the effect of casting multiple votes for
an office; and
(ii) providing the voter with instructions on
how to correct the ballot before it is cast and
counted (including instructions on how to correct
the error through the issuance of a replacement
ballot if the voter was otherwise unable to
change
the ballot or correct any error).
It is entirely legal under HAVA to simply provide good voter
education, a device is not mandated. Note that the language implies
that even punch card systems may be used.
Thanks for your consideration of this detail, and your concern about
this important issue.
Joe
Joe Pezzillo
PO Box J
Boulder, CO 80306 USA
jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx
303-938-8850