Re: Would this qualify as a "conspiracy"?

[Paul E Condon <pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It all depends on ones point of view. I'm sure some elected officials
view this list as a conspiracy to disrupt the orderly winning of elections
by the 'right' candidate.

On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:34:02PM -0700, Al Kolwicz wrote:
>  
> 
> It is very clear that there is a coordinated effort to disallow paper
> ballots in Colorado.  This might be illegal.  
> 
>  
> 
> At a minimum, it should be reason enough to replace every elected official
> and candidate who is working to suppress the wishes of the people.  
> 
>  
> 
> Would this qualify as a "conspiracy"?
> 
>  
> 
> Click to read the
> <http://www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz/automark_01222006.htm>  facts
> including a demonstration of the AutoMARK.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Al Kolwicz
> 
> CAMBER - Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results
> 
> 2867 Tincup Circle
> 
> Boulder, CO 80305
> 
> 303-494-1540
> 
> AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz <http://www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz/>  
> 
> www.coloradovoter.blogspot.com <http://www.coloradovoter.blogspot.com/>  
> 
>  
> 
> CAMBER is a dedicated group of volunteers who are working to ensure that
> every voter gets to vote once, every vote is counted once, and that every
> ballot is secure and anonymous.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 

-- 
Paul E Condon           
pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx