Re: Would this qualify as a "conspiracy"?

[Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@xxxxxxxxx>]

Whether explicit or implicit, there appears to be a quid pro quo between the
major parties to create as many safe seats at all levels of government as
possible.

If memory serves me, 98% of the members of congress were reelected.

If it weren't for term limits in Colorado, we'd probably be facing the same
thing.

Of course, here in Boulder, we extended the terms of nearly everyone in the
last election.  Heaven forbid that the wrong candidates get elected.

Ralph Shnelvar

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:41:19 -0700, you wrote:

>It all depends on ones point of view. I'm sure some elected officials
>view this list as a conspiracy to disrupt the orderly winning of elections
>by the 'right' candidate.
>
>On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:34:02PM -0700, Al Kolwicz wrote:
>>  
>> 
>> It is very clear that there is a coordinated effort to disallow paper
>> ballots in Colorado.  This might be illegal.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> At a minimum, it should be reason enough to replace every elected official
>> and candidate who is working to suppress the wishes of the people.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Would this qualify as a "conspiracy"?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Click to read the
>> <http://www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz/automark_01222006.htm>  facts
>> including a demonstration of the AutoMARK.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Al Kolwicz
>> 
>> CAMBER - Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results
>> 
>> 2867 Tincup Circle
>> 
>> Boulder, CO 80305
>> 
>> 303-494-1540
>> 
>> AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz <http://www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz/>  
>> 
>> www.coloradovoter.blogspot.com <http://www.coloradovoter.blogspot.com/>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> CAMBER is a dedicated group of volunteers who are working to ensure that
>> every voter gets to vote once, every vote is counted once, and that every
>> ballot is secure and anonymous.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>>