Re: RFPET Recommendation

[Neal McBurnett <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:42:19PM -0700, Delta wrote:
> > It is a shame to see the committee not require that the system comply
> > with Colorado law (by producing auditable results) and rush ahead in
> > the face of so many problems.
> 
> WRONG! The recommendations say that a real audit must be and *can* be
> performed....
> YOU were instrumental in us recommending that!

Thanks Bo.  I'm sorry I didn't start off by thanking the team for
putting audit language in there.  It is an important step, and it may
indeed result in something better happening this year than last.  I'll
buy you a beer if we actually do get a true audit this year.  Though as
I noted in my last mail, there are still a lot of obstacles that need
to be overcome.

I also recognize that the team was put in a difficult situation by
circumstances beyond the control of most of them.

-Neal