[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Did Linda Salas Lie to Boulder County?


Bo-
Just show us the invitation and stop acting like you're "father knows best".
Linda misrepresented CVV's participation in the RFPET and you know it...why are you always the first to apologize for her anyway?
Membership on the open public e-mail list is hardly membership in the group, especially when your membership on the list consists primarily of attacks on other members or trying to bait other participants into flame wars with you. Besides, in your own words, you withdrew from CVV on or before 4/26/2004. 

"This is why *I* for one have backed off this CVV group"

http://coloradovoter.net/bcv-archive/msg01041.html
Which makes you even claiming to be a member somewhat deceptive in and of itself, but despite your repeated attempts to start arguments, you're still always welcome here, even if, as you've noted, you're always in the minority opinion, and CVV never seems to agree with you (as your e-mails regularly point out).
Funny, given all that, tell me again how CVV chose you to represent it on the RFPET? Can I see that invitation for CVV to participate? The one like all the other named participants got (LWV, ACLU, Ds, Rs, Ls...)? 

Who signed the non-disclosure agreement on behalf of CVV?
And this is what passes for "integrity" at the clerk's office, and you defend it? And you trust people who would act like that to count your votes?
"I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven." Matthew 18:3 (NIV) 

Joe



On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:25 PM, Delta wrote:


For Cat's sake, Joe....stop acting like a petulant child.
CVV was specifically invited on the second and third RFPET meetings to give 
public testimony, because a representative was there and asked.
It's in the minutes....
CVV *gave* testimony.....that's in the minutes, too.

And as far as *my* membership in CVV goes (which Mr. Shnelvar didn't
question, but did complain that I wasn't mainstream CVV) I was there when the group started....I have as much right as anyone to claim to be a part of 
it. I have different ideas than some of you....so do some others. That
doesn't mean that any of us could not be a representative of the
group...informal as that membership/representation is.

Everyone who wanted to, said their piece....during the RFPET hearings.
It's not very democratic of you to denounce the entire process because
everybody didn't listen to your version and do everything *you* wanted. 
Your voice was heard and then the Team moved on.
Feel free to continue to push your particular agenda, but realize how you 
belittle it by being petty.

Bo


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Pezzillo [mailto:jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:54 PM
To: Linda Salas; Joshua B. Liss; CVV Voting
Cc: Shelley Bailey; Boulder County Commissioners
Subject: Did Linda Salas Lie to Boulder County?



4/6/2006

Boulder County Clerk Linda Salas:

Today, in testimony before the Boulder County Commissioners, you
stated that Citizens for Verifiable Voting had been invited to
participate in your latest RFP evaluation committee.

Please immediately produce the invitation you sent to CVV to
participate or publicly retract your statements.

A Boulder County attorney and the Commissioners have been CC'd on
this e-mail.

If you do not produce the invitation you claimed you extended to CVV
or retract your statements, the next step will be to present this
information to the press.

You have made false statements before the Boulder County
Commissioners before (1/29/2004), I can compile a complete list if
necessary.

You may make your written statement of retraction to the CVV mailing
list, a statement from your staff will not be sufficient.

Joe Pezzillo
PO Box J
Boulder, CO 80306
303-938-8850
jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx