RE: Did Linda Salas Lie to Boulder County?

["Delta" <delta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

so, just how "pure" do you have to be to be considered a "member"???
show me your membership list.....

I was there at the beginning and I am still there.
sounds like a member to me.

i do not apologize for the Clerk....I *try* to apologize for you being a
jerk.

I'm sick and tired of all you little weenies yelling and complaining because
nobody does what *you* want.....
Your way or the highway???

Nutz.

I am a member of CVV and have been since the beginning....even if I try to
distance myself from the more fanatical members.....Doesn't matter WHAT kind
of spin *you* try to put on it.
I was instrumental in getting CVV to be heard by the Team.
CVV voiced concerns and they were listened to.....just not all *your*
desires were met....GET OVER IT.

You make yourself (and others by association), look petty and ridiculous,
calling for a written invitation.....
Keep it up and NOBODY will invite CVV ANYwhere.....

Bo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Pezzillo [mailto:jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:50 PM
> To: delta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Linda Salas; Joshua B. Liss; CVV Voting; Shelley Bailey; Boulder
> County Commissioners
> Subject: Re: Did Linda Salas Lie to Boulder County?
>
>
>
> Bo-
>
> Just show us the invitation and stop acting like you're "father knows
> best".
>
> Linda misrepresented CVV's participation in the RFPET and you know
> it...why are you always the first to apologize for her anyway?
>
> Membership on the open public e-mail list is hardly membership in the
> group, especially when your membership on the list consists primarily
> of attacks on other members or trying to bait other participants into
> flame wars with you. Besides, in your own words, you withdrew from
> CVV on or before 4/26/2004.
>
> "This is why *I* for one have backed off this CVV group"
>
> http://coloradovoter.net/bcv-archive/msg01041.html
>
> Which makes you even claiming to be a member somewhat deceptive in
> and of itself, but despite your repeated attempts to start arguments,
> you're still always welcome here, even if, as you've noted, you're
> always in the minority opinion, and CVV never seems to agree with you
> (as your e-mails regularly point out).
>
> Funny, given all that, tell me again how CVV chose you to represent
> it on the RFPET? Can I see that invitation for CVV to participate?
> The one like all the other named participants got (LWV, ACLU, Ds, Rs,
> Ls...)?
>
> Who signed the non-disclosure agreement on behalf of CVV?
>
> And this is what passes for "integrity" at the clerk's office, and
> you defend it? And you trust people who would act like that to count
> your votes?
>
> "I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little
> children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven." Matthew 18:3
> (NIV)
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:25 PM, Delta wrote:
>
> > For Cat's sake, Joe....stop acting like a petulant child.
> > CVV was specifically invited on the second and third RFPET meetings
> > to give
> > public testimony, because a representative was there and asked.
> > It's in the minutes....
> > CVV *gave* testimony.....that's in the minutes, too.
> >
> > And as far as *my* membership in CVV goes (which Mr. Shnelvar didn't
> > question, but did complain that I wasn't mainstream CVV) I was
> > there when
> > the group started....I have as much right as anyone to claim to be
> > a part of
> > it. I have different ideas than some of you....so do some others. That
> > doesn't mean that any of us could not be a representative of the
> > group...informal as that membership/representation is.
> >
> > Everyone who wanted to, said their piece....during the RFPET hearings.
> > It's not very democratic of you to denounce the entire process because
> > everybody didn't listen to your version and do everything *you*
> > wanted.
> > Your voice was heard and then the Team moved on.
> > Feel free to continue to push your particular agenda, but realize
> > how you
> > belittle it by being petty.
> >
> > Bo
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Joe Pezzillo [mailto:jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:54 PM
> >> To: Linda Salas; Joshua B. Liss; CVV Voting
> >> Cc: Shelley Bailey; Boulder County Commissioners
> >> Subject: Did Linda Salas Lie to Boulder County?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 4/6/2006
> >>
> >> Boulder County Clerk Linda Salas:
> >>
> >> Today, in testimony before the Boulder County Commissioners, you
> >> stated that Citizens for Verifiable Voting had been invited to
> >> participate in your latest RFP evaluation committee.
> >>
> >> Please immediately produce the invitation you sent to CVV to
> >> participate or publicly retract your statements.
> >>
> >> A Boulder County attorney and the Commissioners have been CC'd on
> >> this e-mail.
> >>
> >> If you do not produce the invitation you claimed you extended to CVV
> >> or retract your statements, the next step will be to present this
> >> information to the press.
> >>
> >> You have made false statements before the Boulder County
> >> Commissioners before (1/29/2004), I can compile a complete list if
> >> necessary.
> >>
> >> You may make your written statement of retraction to the CVV mailing
> >> list, a statement from your staff will not be sufficient.
> >>
> >> Joe Pezzillo
> >> PO Box J
> >> Boulder, CO 80306
> >> 303-938-8850
> >> jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>