Re: Longmont: Decision next Tuesday night

[Paul E Condon <pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:34:13AM -0700, Paul Tiger wrote:
[snip]
> Local participation in what generally turned out to be open gripe 
> that's spin. However, in tasking assignments it must be accepted that a 
> team assigned to a loser candidate might be have little to do while 
> another is nailed. 14  may not be enough to count this many with 
> effective accuracy. I don't know how to do this. In fact, I don't know 
> much, except that the only computers that should be involved in 
> elections is hand calculators.
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> -- 

Hand calculators are a really bad calculating numbers for an official
record. There is no record, no paper trail of what numbers were
entered into the calculator/computer. Of course the possible bad
numbers are 'human error', but hand calculator facilitate human error.

Otherwise, a fine report on happenings in Longmont.
Thanks.

-- 
Paul E Condon           
pecondon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx