Re: 3 points: Re: Hart InterCivic presentation materials up

[Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Bollinger wrote:

> 2.  I do not understand how a paper receipt "facilitates vote-buying."  The
> paper receipt should be essentially the same as a paper ballot, once the
> voter verifies it is accurate.

Hi JCBollinger,

the theory, at least, is that as a Candidate A supporter, I can promise to
pay a voter money for bringing back a paper receipt that shows that they
voted for Candidate A.  Without a paper receipt, I have no way of knowing
whether the voter actually voted for Candidate A or not.


- Paul