All this "hand" counting and "hand" marking.......
Does it strike anyone else as a pretty Luddite type of stance??
how about coming up with *constructive* ways to make technology work
*for*
us rather than agin' us?
I fail to see where a buncha tired, retired and unemployed people (the
volunteers who would be doing the hand counting after polls close)
would be
more accurate than an impartial machine scanner.
*That* should be the focus........moving us into the future with
secure,
verifiable and accurate technology.
NOT returning us to technology of 200 years ago.
Bo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Mcgrath" <mcgrath_mcnally@xxxxxxx>
To: <evan@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx>; <cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <davide475@xxxxxxxx>;
<david.ellington@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx>;
<mlambie@xxxxxxxxx>; <mlambie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<texico86@xxxxxxx>;
<peter.raich@xxxxxxxx>; <TresCeeA@xxxxxxx>;
<michelle.mulder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <tahommel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <PKlammer@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:18 AM
Subject: Hand Counting: How Possible Is It for This Year?
Evan,
I appreciate your commitment to the simplest possible solution, and
one
that
is demonstrably considered the most effective by the authors of the
Cal
Tech/MIT study on voting systems.