[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hand Counting: How Possible Is It for This Year?




Bo-


Strange though it may sound in this day and age of putting high-tech spacecraft on Mars, didn't the CalTech/MIT study find that hand counted paper ballots were the most accurate? Some technologies endure for a reason, right? I'd vote for some new energy technology before new elections technology, personally.

Do you support the idea of a statistically valid sample hand-count to verify the machines?

In either event, I agree that it is crucial to get more people involved in our elections.

Joe



On Apr 7, 2004, at 11:26 AM, delta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

All this "hand" counting and "hand" marking.......
Does it strike anyone else as a pretty Luddite type of stance??

how about coming up with *constructive* ways to make technology work *for*
us rather than agin' us?
I fail to see where a buncha tired, retired and unemployed people (the
volunteers who would be doing the hand counting after polls close) would be
more accurate than an impartial machine scanner.
*That* should be the focus........moving us into the future with secure,
verifiable and accurate technology.
NOT returning us to technology of 200 years ago.


Bo

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Mcgrath" <mcgrath_mcnally@xxxxxxx>
To: <evan@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <AlKolwicz@xxxxxxxxx>; <cmehesy@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <davide475@xxxxxxxx>;
<david.ellington@xxxxxxxxxxx>; <donna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <jpezzillo@xxxxxxxxx>;
<mlambie@xxxxxxxxx>; <mlambie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <texico86@xxxxxxx>;
<peter.raich@xxxxxxxx>; <TresCeeA@xxxxxxx>;
<michelle.mulder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <tahommel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <PKlammer@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:18 AM
Subject: Hand Counting: How Possible Is It for This Year?



Evan,

I appreciate your commitment to the simplest possible solution, and one
that
is demonstrably considered the most effective by the authors of the Cal
Tech/MIT study on voting systems.