[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Coloradoans for Voting Integrity Update



Title: CFVI Newsletter - Issue: 16
US Flag CFVI
Logo
CFVI
HomepageCFVI ForumCFVI Event
CalendarYour
Account Coloradoans for Voting Integrity

CFVI Update: Thursday, October 14, 2004
Issue: 16

Click o­n any highlighted link below for more information.

IT'S CRUNCH TIME! ONLY 3 WEEKS LEFT BEFORE THE ELECTION!

How confident do you feel that your hard work to elect your candidate will pay off this election?

What if it was rigged to fail? What if close results push us into a recount, but our systems aren't set up to perform recounts? What if Colorado in 2004 becomes what Florida was to the 2000 election? It could happen. Over half of the state's votes will be cast upon electronic voting machines that do NOT offer a paper trail or any other method of verifying that your vote was accurately captured when you touch the touchscreen.

Our group, Coloradoans for Voting Integrity, has labored for the past year to work with our legislators, to hold rallies, to educate election officials, to train volunteers, and to provide information to the media to protect our votes.

Guess what?

The legislators have turned this non-partisan issue into a partisan defense of our Secretary of State (Republican) and whatever (bad) advice she has given.

The election community has circled the wagons against any critics or people who might actually KNOW something about computer fallibility or systems integrity, or election security processes.

The media has IGNORED our rallies, our letters to the editor, and our appeals for common sense, using every contact as an opportunity to hand an open mic or a blank slate for the election officials to repeat their (un)assuring messages of blind trust in their (non-scientific) judgement.

So folks, it's time to pay to get our message out. We need your help to pay for space ads in the Post, the News, on radio shows and, if budgets allow, on television.

We have a team ready to produce videos or CDs containing various scenarios showing what may happen if we allow this (non-protected) election to transpire as if nothing is wrong. But duplication and distribution of this information to the media takes money and time.

Won't you help? (Remember, by donating to CFVI, you are making a tax deductible donation to safe elections!)

$1000 helps us fund one week of our PR firm to pitch these stories to the press, or to arrange for press conferences and interviews for our story to get heard in these remaining days before the election, or to write and transmit media advisories and media kits.

$500 helps us fund production costs for filming and scripting videos for distribution to the media and to election officials and county party officials, or helps fund T-shirts for our volunteers.

$100 helps us buy 100 CD's to distribute to the media, containing video messages, skits, and even clips from various TV shows that have already commented on the dangers of use of these machines.

$50 helps us buy a couple radio spots on local talk radio.

$25 helps us pay for postage and supplies to take our message to the major Party Chairs in the counties in Colorado that will vote by electronic voting machines, or to buy buttons or a few T-shirts to make our volunteers visible on election day, when we will act as poll monitors.

What will you say to the next generation when they asked what costs you were wiling to pay to protect our democracy in this election?

For more info, please visit CFVI and Verified Voting


Bob McGrath, Director
CFVI

P.S. Tight on funds? How about volunteering to help us? We need volunteers to monitor the processing of absentee ballots. This is a critical way to ensure that ballots don't get spoiled! WE want ballots to be counted, and we need public oversight over our election officials to make sure they're doing their job! Contact your favorite candidate or campaign to volunteer to be a central counting poll watcher, in particular for the absentee ballot or early ballot counting!

Don't forget, Oct 26 = last day for receiving a mail-in absentee ballot; Oct 29 = last day to apply for a hand-carried absentee ballot.


DonateNow




Events:

Event Date: Oct 19, 2004
Meetings - CFVI Meeting:
We will be meeting at 7 p.m. on Tuesday night at the Maes Building on Colfax & Xavier Streets in Lakewood, to discuss developing an intensive campaign aimed at PR, increasing media coverage and focusing political and people-powered pressure upon the Secretary of State's Office.
Find out more.

Event Date: Oct 26, 2004
Meetings - CFVI Meeting:
We will be meeting at 7 p.m. on Tuesday night at the Maes Building on Colfax & Xavier Streets in Lakewood, to discuss developing an intensive campaign aimed at PR, increasing media coverage and focusing political and people-powered pressure upon the Secretary of State's Office.
Find out more.

Event Date: Nov 02, 2004
Other - US Election:
Election Day!
Find out more.


Latest News Articles:

E-Voting Vendors, Foes Count Down To Election Day

With accusations spreading about electronic voting susceptibility to tampering, watchdog groups are calling on computer experts to come to the polls not only to vote, but to watch others vote. So far the Verified Voting Foundation (VVF) has recruited more than 1,300 volunteers for its TechWatch program. Prior to the election, volunteers will observe tests conducted by election officials to make sure the equipment is working correctly. On Election Day, watchers will be posted at the polls and filing web-based incident reports as necessary. The Election Incident Reporting System is designed to allow volunteers to rapidly collect information about election irregularities, and instantly alert attorneys and technology professionals to potential problems.

Here's a link to the article


Posted by: Admin on 2004-10-13 22:28:41

E-Voting Rountable

Siliconvalley.com is sponsoring a weeklong e-voting roundtable. Check out the site and submit your questions. Surprise of surprises, "Diebold Election Systems and Sequoia Voting Systems declined to participate in this discussion."

E-Voting Roundtable


Posted by: Earache on 2004-10-13 22:20:37

E-Voting Machine Crash Deepens Concerns

A computer crash that forced a pre-election test of electronic voting machines to be postponed was trumpeted by critics as proof of the balloting technology's unreliability. The incident in Palm Beach County ? which is infamous for its hanging and pregnant chads during the 2000 presidential election ? did not directly involve the touch-screen terminals on which nearly one in three U.S. voters will cast ballots on Election Day.

Here's a link to the article


Posted by: Admin on 2004-10-13 22:15:25

Diebold and the Disabled

Many disabled groups have been supporting electronic voting machines, going so far as suing states for not installing the machines. I've never understood the reasoning for this. Sure they allow people to vote without assistance, but what happens if that vote in never counted. Wired has posted an article which suggests that lobbying by the disabled may have more to do with money than equal access. Sounds like a touchy issue.

Here's a link to the article


Posted by: Earache on 2004-10-13 20:44:49

Letter to Colorado Secretary of State, Donneta Davidson

To the office of the Colorado Secretary of State
Donnetta Davidson

Dear Ms. Lisa Doran:

You stated that ?Unfortunately there is well-documented historical proof that elections conducted with paper ballots are easily subject to human error and fraud.? But you failed to account for the more grievous fraud that can be foisted on the electorate by an electronic system

? that does not provide paper ballot validation,
? that can be hacked by computer professionals,
? that can be manipulated by one or two lines of code,
? that does not allow for a meaningful ballot recount (not aggregate data),
? whose COUNTING software is not scrutinized and not publicized,
? whose Operating System software remains beyond the scrutiny of your tests,
? whose machine code goes unchallenged by your tests, and
? whose owners? credentials are highly suspect and whose political bias is widely known.

Your DRE voting solution, and this repetitive mumbo-jumbo that your office continues to regurgitate is an affront to all computer professionals, including me. We know how easy it would be to manipulate an election when the results produced are only provided in AGGREGATE form instead of itemized voting records, and when there is no paper ballot trail.

This is a serious matter. In computer parlance, redundancy of systems is desirable for reliability and accuracy. But by not providing a paper ballot trail your office has removed the most critical element from a verifiable election.

Has your office validated the ES&S iVotronic machine code? The Operating System? The software that counts the votes? Do you know why the ES&S iVotronic machines only provide AGGREGATE data, summary data? You cannot answer yes to any of these questions because ES&S, owned by Mr. Urosevich, refuses to make public the machine code, the operating system code, and the counting software code; he defends his actions on ?proprietary? grounds.

But we are talking about ?public? voting systems that should be TRANSPARENT, and OPEN to public review and scrutiny. This system is not.

And why is your office so resistant to providing a paper trail?

The voting system in Colorado, with its 56.8% DRE electronic voting machines, is vulnerable to corruption, and is thus unacceptable. There must be a verifiable method for recounting ballots.

Posted by: Admin on 2004-10-12 15:56:45

Latest Links:

Become An Election Protection Volunteer!
In the last presidential election, millions of votes were never counted. Voters in minority communities were disproportionately disenfranchised through illegal disqualification, intimidation, and faulty voting machines. The nonpartisan Election Protection coalition needs you to stand up and defend voting rights November 2!

Electronic Frontier Foundation
EFF E-Voting The 2004 presidential election might not be flawed like the last one was; it might be even worse. Communities across America are purchasing electronic voting (e-voting) machines, but the technology has serious security problems that aren't being addressed. Most of the machines use "black box" software that hasn't been publicly reviewed for security. Almost none provide voter-verifiable paper ballots to detect fraud. A recent analysis by several academic researchers outlines the many and varied ways that anyone from a technically proficient insider to an average voter could disrupt an e-voting system to defraud an election. The response of some of the companies that make e-voting machines has been even more upsetting. Instead of embracing close technical review and public interest in its products, one of the three major manufacturers of these machines has embarked upon a campaign of sending cease-and-desist letters to those who criticize it. The company first sent one to the academic researchers and then later sent many to individuals and groups who republished internal email messages that reveal both the problems with the systems and employee attempts to cover up those problems. E-Voting technology is promising, but its benefits should not obscure its dangers. Without basic auditing checks, these machines dramatically increase the chances for undetectable election fraud. This archive is a resource in the fight for accountable elections and responsible voting technology. NOTE: More information on all litigation related to verified voting is available at http://www.verifiedvoting.org/legal/

Contact the Congress!
Contacting the Congress is a very up-to-date database of congressional contact information for the 108th Congress. As of August 14, 2004 there are 520 email addresses (of which 448 are Web-based email homepages), and 540 WWW homepages known for the 540 members of the 108th Congress. More traditional ground mail addresses are available for all Congressmembers

Voters Unite!
About Us We believe we can make a difference, but we can't do it alone. We need you, too. Our highest priority is to work toward elections in which we can be confident. We have been very active in the fight for verifiable voting, and we feel an urgency to participate in unity of action with all the diverse groups and individuals who now consider themselves 'voting activists' as well as those who have recently become concerned about elections in the United States. Ellen Theisen worked with VerifiedVoting.org from August 2003 through March 2004. She spearheaded the volunteer lobbying efforts that tripled the number of co-sponsors for H.R.2239 and led to the introduction of companion Senate bills. She is now dedicated to unifying activists in an effort to secure our elections. Peter Johnson, activist, grassroots mobilizer, and founder of www.americanether.net. Helping to free information and encourage civic participation, he has assisted various organizations working for election accountability and transparency.

State
Capitol
Coloradoans for Voting Integrity
7114 West Jefferson Avenue, Suite 100
Lakewood, CO 80235
Ph: (303) 231-1031 | Fx: (303) 980-0609

CFVI respects your right to privacy and will not share your information with others unless you expressly permit such sharing.


For more information, please visit our web site. Please do not respond using the address from which this email was sent.
If you do NOT wish to receive future event from CFVI visit the Subscriptions Services.

Copyright © 2004 Coloradoans for Voting Integrity. All rights reserved.

pnTresMailer by Tresware.com