|
Eeghads! I thought it was only some
of the precinct ballots that had been off-registered or skewed. Are you saying
that the majority of ballots were skewed? And I guess you’re telling us that
most of the ballots had to be recreated on new ballots to be counted. If that is true, then where did the
C&R find enough ballots to recreate the entire election? Did Eagle print
new ballots for this purpose? Might it not have been easier to
reset the template for the scanners to register the actual locations of the
boxes? Or maybe that would have violated some rules? If there were people recreating new
ballots from the ones that wouldn’t scan, then couldn’t they also have CREATED
new ones that never existed before? Mighty scary. BTW – looks like we had an 87% plus
turn out of the 176,140 registered voters. Pretty cool, if it is real. sg -----Original
Message----- The Now
they begin processing duplicated ballots and about 2,500 provisional ballots. See the
website at http://www.co.boulder.co.us/clerk/elect/2004%20General/Frame.htm
Early
ballots and almost all absentee ballots were processed before precinct ballots
were prepared for counting. Reports
indicate that a major cause of the delay in posting election results was the
printing of the precinct ballots and the fact that nobody verified that the
ballots were correctly printed. The new
equipment could not read the precinct ballots, so most votes cast in precincts
had to be re-marked by election workers. There
is no way to determine if the votes were correctly marked. Once
the votes are counted, the Canvass Board will attempt to verify that all
eligible ballots were counted, and that all votes were accurately counted. Cross
your fingers and toes. Al CAMBER Citizens
for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results 303-494-1540 www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz
http://coloradovoter.blogspot.com |