[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: SVM counters

To: Paul Tiger - LPBC - Outreach <outreach@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: SVM counters
From: Evan Daniel Ravitz <evan@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:53:08 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: CVV <cvv-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mailing list cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net
In-reply-to: <NDBBLNCOIGKCHPKLEIPFGELOGKAA.outreach@lpboulder.org>
List-help: <mailto:cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net>
List-post: <mailto:cvv-discuss@coloradovoter.net>
List-subscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-subscribe@coloradovoter.net>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:cvv-discuss-unsubscribe@coloradovoter.net>
Mailing-list: contact cvv-discuss-help@coloradovoter.net; run by ezmlm
References: <NDBBLNCOIGKCHPKLEIPFGELOGKAA.outreach@lpboulder.org>

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Paul Tiger - LPBC - Outreach wrote:

I've already stated that I don't think that humans can accurately count
ballots (or races in our case).

The MIT/Caltech study shows hand-counting is the MOST accurate, followed by optical scanning.

Evan

References:
- RE: SVM counters
  - From: Paul Tiger - LPBC - Outreach

Prev by Date: RE: ERC Report Draft Insults Election Reform Activists
Next by Date: Re: ERC Report Draft Insults Election Reform Activists
Previous by thread: RE: SVM counters
Next by thread: Re: ERC Report Draft Insults Election Reform Activists
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread